looks like an awesome tool!
I just found it funny that in code interpreter demo, javascript is used to evaluate mathematical problems (especially the float comparison)
(now ex-) Firefox user here. I think I am in love with this browser.
I tried switching to arc, but it didn't stick since I really got used to the Firefox way of life. The arc browser also felt really commercial and has a lot of gimmicky AI features, which is not optimal.
This Zen browser is like a blend of the best of both worlds!
Interesting... I am a longtime Bootstrap user, and they offer a large number of other things that can be configured for the same purpose- alerts, popovers, modals, etc.
I've never actually noticed the toasts component itself, but have done the same thing with other components. I wonder if the feature was added after I started using bootstrap ~14 years ago, and I mostly just kept using the components I was used to.
Looking at it, I don't see myself using it because of the 'dismiss' button. I don't like things that obscure the UI, or encourage unneeded extra interaction, when I can pass info to the user without doing that.
In my opinion EndeavourOS is the best "Arch for the rest of us" type of distro. Manjaro has proven countless times that their main team is incompetent at best.
Agreed! I migrated from Manjaro to EOS after Manjaro broke packages and installations for the second time in a couple years, and my experience has been rock solid with EOS.
I've never had any problems with Manjaro, and it seems actually quite good to me, too. But the key difference is that it uses its own, different, package repositories.
EndeavorOS is similarly "arch linux plus and installer and large set of GUI packages" but after it's installed, you use the exact same main Arch repositories to update your system, as if you had installed Arch yourself, and then installed all the same packages that EndeavorOS chooses.
This is what makes EndeavorOS "the most Arch" arch-like distro. The experience with Manjaro is pretty similar to Arch, but not as similar.
I think that’s often the point with OSS projects, especially those that have an ambitious long term vision. If you “don’t want to boot up a Linux VM” etc, they don’t want you. It’s a filter. It means their concern at the moment is the coherence of their community, not increasing their numbers. It’s the same reason projects like this often have absurdly ugly logos, and landing pages that don’t work on mobile. Fast growth is often seen as destructive when you already have a nice little community vibe. It’s essential to maintain that vibe carefully if you have a long term goal of building something important.
Counterpoint, it would be another release / packaging they would have to build and maintain, unless they find a volunteer that can do it without detracting from their core business, it's not worth the investment (to them).
Anyone can set up a pipeline to distribute ISO images though, it's open source.
So, what's the benefit of using this over something like faker?
Isn't the point of most of these identity generation tools to generate huge amounts of test data? This would just make that free process cost something.
I have to admit that I fell into a rabbit hole, and I noticed that popular tools like fakerjs or gofakeit[0] did not meet my needs.
I needed to generate realistic-looking identities; the person's photo must match the gender, same for the age, the skin color of the person must correspond with the origin of the surname, the first name should be common in the targeted country, and the residential address must be real, among other things.
You would not use this for test data btw, a common use case for this would be for marketing or spamming operations where you need realistic data. My consciense does not accept the later however ;-)
P.S. Nowadays, these fake data generators are too woke to provide genderized first names..
