Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more dm2's commentslogin

According to this document it was stolen: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a160564.pdf


Does 1Password have a web based version?


The backup creates a web app, '1Password Anywhere'. It's nice how they do it since it's self-hosted.


Text only cache because site is broken at the moment: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.bro...


Here is a really good documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwpgmEvlRpM

Does anyone know any other documentaries about this topic? It's a fascinating event to study.


> Does anyone know any other documentaries about this topic? It's a fascinating event to study.

"The Day After Trinity" (1981) is a really, really good documentary on the Manhattan Project. I like that it goes in depth about the characters involved, too -- Oppenheimer was a fascinating person.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080594/



Not a documentary but there's a fantastic book called The Making of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes. The book also covers the history of nuclear physics.


DHS is responsible for securing dot-gov, including their databases. It's considered a "federal civilian network".

USCYBERCOM is responsible for dot-mil, with the help of the NSA.


Documents related to security clearances fall on which side of the hacked fence?


It's the Department of Homeland Security's responsibility, but that doesn't mean that anyone necessarily failed at their job. Just that it's a very difficult job.

The NSA will certainly contribute tools and expertise when needed to any US government agency/department.

The DHS tool "Einstein" is an intrusion detection system that detected the breach.

CIA records are assumed to not be held by the OPM, for the reason that they are the ones that are most sensitive if stolen.


I don't think that streaming to YouTube is as easy as direct streaming to Twitch, maybe that's one of the areas they are focusing on.

Streamers will make sacrifices for their audience. If the technology isn't available to stream VR well then they won't do it.

What would be really cool is a game that supports streaming to YouTube 360, where it records a view similar to what the Jump camera rig does in real life.


It's from dozens of Christian sites and forum posts linking to that page and because the search query matches the URL and page title exactly.

Google ranks the URL words too high it looks like.

Why is this BBC page not in the top 10 results? Is it solely because of the page URL? It has more backlinks and a more trusted domain. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/dino_prog...

This says that the original page has over 17 million backlinks, but that can't be correct: https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/overview/subdomains?target=...

And it participates in social media a lot: http://www.reddit.com/domain/answersingenesis.org

Should Google decrease the "worth" of that domain? If there is content that has a high SEO rating but is factually incorrect, does that deserve to be lower on the search results listing?

Should Google display different cards based on the user? Someone which Google determines is highly religious verses not religious would get different cards?

Update: Oh no, something needs to be done, this site is disgusting: https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-against-evolution/bill...


I still don't know exactly what swiping a card on Google Now means.

Sometimes I want to swipe a card because I've already read that article, sometimes I want to swipe it because I have no interest in seeing that article/specific webpage.

We need filters for Google Now, excluding some sites, having favorite sites. I'd love to get ycombinator news through Google Now and have it learn which stories interest me the most.


This is the image from the original article, completely different airplane too.

http://defensetech.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ISIL-Airst...

It's all stock images either way, nothing I saw even mentioned what kind of jets were deployed.


Also of note is that the airplane pictured in the original article (a F-35) is not used in combat yet, nor is it likely that the limited numbers delivered by now will be rated for combat any time soon unless the US gets into a serious peer fight and actually need all their planes.


Those are F15E aircraft.

The F35 has some signature green lights that really stand out at night (I assume they'll be turned off during combat): http://www.edwards.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/photos/2013/0...

Here is a picture of 2 F35s being refueled at the same time: http://breakingdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2013/0...


That image looks like a F-15 to me. Either way, just random stock imagery we don't know what kinda of planes deployed the missiles.


Did anyone find the tweet or a screenshot of it?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: