It's gotten ok now. Just spent a day with Claude for the first time in a while. Demanded strict TDD and implemented one test at a time. Might have been faster, hard to say for sure. Result was good.
It's probably not unrealistic that a programmer who learns Vim well could be, say, 2x more productive in Vim than in, say, Nano.
Yet programmers who have used Nano were not (at least not significantly) scoffed at or ridiculed. It was their choice of tool, and they were getting work done.
It seems unclear how much more productive AI coding tools can make a programmer; some people claim 10x, some claim it actually makes you slower. But let us suppose it is on average the same 2x productivity increase as Vim.
Why then was using Vim not heralded from every rooftop the same as using AI?
It's funny, because this decision by Joel in 2006 prefigures TypeScript six years later. VBA was a terrible bet for a target language and Joel was crazy to think his little company could sustain a language ecosystem, but Microsoft had the same idea and nailed it.