Preface: I am really bad when it comes to remembering names.
One thing I did when I started my current job, was drawing out a floorplan with the names of people at their desk position, their project (and role if known).
Sure it was far from complete on day 1 but it helps me learn and remember the names of everyone.
It's an argument about nothing. A trademark is a repository for a company's reputation. A new company has none. If it's unable to use its preferred mark, no harm is done. That is, of course, unless its intention all along is to steal the limelight of another.
The movie 'Nerve' [1] immediately comes to my mind.
Some supervision about what dares are acceptable is definetly necessary. Otherwise thinfs might get out of control rather quickly.
Well, peanut allergy is lethal and can be triggered by even inhalation of peanut dust in more severe cases.
Sensitivity to sunlight is way more manageable (by applying sunscreen and covering the skin) and although kids share food and/or eat them in the same environment I don't think they're carrying UV lights to apply to other kids.
There is plenty of other potentially lethal allergies that can be just as severe, singling out peanuts is overkill as I mentioned in a sibling thread. (Soy, milk, wheat, gluten. Especially wheat allergy can cause reactions just as severe as the stereotypical peanut allergy)
edit: Note that an allergy to sunlight exposure (which is a thing) is not simply treated with sun cream
Can they trigger reaction by simply having it in the room? I can get an allergic reaction from having peanuts in the same room as I'm in, in the same way as a reaction from pollen or from animals. So wonder if other food based allergy can have the same effect on others
