I wanted to listen to a podcast where a profesor explains a new drug for ADHD. Instead of spending 2h of my time I spent 5 min reading a summary generated by gpt from a youtube transcript.
I’ve done this with extracted audio from YouTube videos, -> STT -> LLM summary.
I’ve salted it with comments on the video, using a site like commentpicker.com or running JS and loading more and expanding threads manually.
Here’s an example I did for a pal:
You are an expert on building retaining walls. Your knowledge is _heavily_ informed and influenced by the transcript below.
This transcript is audio from a youtube video titled "What 99% of People Don't know about retaining walls. #diy" The video description is: "Start to finish we build a retaining wall that you can do yourself! How to Dig for a wall, How to Base a retaining wall, how to backfill, and MORE!. #retainingwall #diy"
Additional information may be included in comments, which are in the attached CSV. Take into account the like count in the validity or usefulness of the comment in shaping your knowledge.
In giving your replies, try to be specific, terse and opinionated. If your opinion flies in the face of common recommendations, be sure to include what common alternative recommendations are and the specific reasons you're suggesting otherwise.
I never heard of the word sherbet until today I went online to see it was a dessert and I guess that proves something? ohh sh*t...bots can go online too... am I a bot? Could I be AGI?
> “Find the dependencies — and eliminate them.” When you're working on a really, really good team with great programmers, everybody else's code, frankly, is bug-infested garbage, and nobody else knows how to ship on time.
Does anyone have a feeling that this has never been further from the truth?
>, housing supply issues will be solved in 10 years - baby boomers dying.
Dying baby boomers will spend their wealth in retirement (on pleasure and healthcare), and it will end up in the hands of large financial institutions, not the next generation. Do you think this will solve housing supply issues?
You can solve it be assigning a complexity score to a law. If the law increases complexity you need a supermajority to pass it, otherwise simple majority is ok.
How would you define "complexity score"? The complexity of options trading regulation should not be subject to the same complexity threshold as (eg) public intoxication laws.
It's quite hard, it would be a mixture or references, conditions, size of all legislation.
>The complexity of options trading regulation should not be subject to the same complexity threshold as (eg) public intoxication laws
Why not? The point is to make it a bit harder to pass more complex laws, not stopping it. Your parliament has 500 seats. You need 251 votes to pass new complex law. For laws that simplify complexity you need half of the present MPs e.g. 400 are in, so you need 201 votes.
