Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ethiclub's commentslogin

Yes, for many (most?) non-technical folk.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_knowledge


Even if you are well-versed in how to do it, it can still be a time sink you may not be able to afford.


And you wouldn't even know that another solution necessarily existed.

And you wouldn't necessarily know where to start.

And you would have the mental hurdles of "where do I start", "who do I listen to", etc.


Good move ...and the consolidations continue...

I notice that the power of these new behemoths are a risk to SMEs. Kaseya/Datto/ITGlue/CWM/Automate/Sophos/BG/Sell... These all used to be of a size that could communicate and deal with small business. Far more focus weighted towards enterprise now.


Sophos still stays squarely in the security space at least, I wouldn’t exactly call them a behemoth.

Now Cisco on the other hand, god damned they have their mitts in everything and most of it’s trash. But nobody got fired for buying Cisco, yet.


It seems a little strange that ITIL wasn't at all discussed (in article or comments) before redesigning the wheel


Feminism is the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.


That's your definition of feminism...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumsnet

- PR and relationships with (governmental or other) organisations

- Intelligent positioning

- (Arguably good timing in the market)

- Community well targeted, needs catered for well.

- Appropriate (simple, fast) technology, little barrier to entry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_News

- Two way beneficial relationship with YC

- Careful / Aggressive (depending on situation and feature) moderation

- General (although arguably slipping into Eternal September) maintenance of a niche community but with steady growth

- Appropriate (simple, fast) technology, little barrier to entry


ArXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08847

ISO 29148:2018: https://www.iso.org/standard/72089.html (Paper utilizes 2011 spec, now withdrawn)


Devil's advocate:

Common, successful marketing: If a brand is poisoned, distance yourself from the name & rebrand. At its extreme, it is used alongside phoenix company tactics.

It works, although a (likely minority) customer portion will keep their finger on the pulse.


Retool and the Retool team are absolutely superb.

In our experience, it's the current winner amongst the flourishing low code/db app/spreadsheet app space. It is one of few that to me, proves that this space should (and will) eat market share from excel/gsheets on one end, and expensive bespoke tools on the other. Also eager to see these offering more competition against small ERPs, CRMs and the like - Perhaps this will eventually even give behemoths such as ConnectWise, Salesforce et al a run for their money. Those companies need some competition on both innovation and price. For now though obviously, this is best used for business automation, small tools, and stitching data/processes together.

Not affiliated, just a very happy customer. Customer support is above and beyond. Trialed internally to great success, thus preparing to consider in client solutions.


If we grant partial personhood based on our knowledge of 'complexity or maturity of consciousness', we are setting ourselves up to a) see ourselves as qualified to do so, and even to 'act as god' in some circumstances, b) creating an expensive, difficult challenge for ourselves, and c) declaring that there is an appropriate hierarchy - arguably comparable of a caste system (Which is scary). Not granting any personhood/ rights at all (our current state) is a subset of this, and the most extreme example of heirarchical positioning based on 'right to be there'.

On the other hand, granting equal rights to all means treating a squirrel as reverently as a human, which society does not seem to agree with.

One of the biggest conversations for the 21st century.

Perhaps the former is a means to an end, and the answer is to slowly assimilate other species into coverage of legislation, with the end game of protecting all live equally. It feels as if future societies would look back and judge us for not immediately siding with the latter.


Any known ring species where (A + B cannot breed OR B + C cannot breed) AND A + B can breed? Assume not possible?


That's logically equivalent to (A + B can breed) AND (B + C cannot breed), not a very exciting question.

Did you mean AND (A + C can breed)?


Still not exciting. I think we are looking for non transitivity: A+B & B+C but !A+C


That's exactly what a ring species is.


Thanks for fixing. Yes that was the intended question.


You are asking for both A&B and !(A&B)?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: