I think you're missing that your needs are different from those of the people quoted in PEP 703: <https://peps.python.org/pep-0703/#motivation>

I literally said I understand that my needs are different.

I get why the PEP exists. I don't get why it's receiving such priority.

I don't think that "flickers between tasks very rapidly to simulate concurrency" is a good mental model for event loops. It's more like "runs one task at a time until it hits a suspension point," where a suspension point is something like an I/O operation. If you had an event loop that switched tasks between suspension points, then you'd still need locks for shared data.

Is this a situation that you find yourself in frequently (with serious work sparked by chance conversations)? It sounds awfully cliché.

No, but that's what the higher ups want to believe. :)

Guess it depends on what you think is frequently, maybe once or twice a year when working in a office setting. Always happened at small companies, and usually what was sparked in the conversation had a big impact on what the company worked on.

So for the off chance that once in 6 months you have a conversation in person that "sparks something" everyone has to suffer commutes and all the other crap that comes with WFO?

Yeah I'll pass on that, thanks

No, I think people should be able to make a choice between working in a office vs working remote, which considering how many jobs are remote nowadays, you can kind of already do.

I'm not saying all companies should work in a office, I'm just sharing my viewpoint from someone who prefers in office compared to remotely.

Intellectual property rights should be abolished.

There are countries in which there is no IP protection, it's not the utopia you think it is.

That's a slippery slope. First, it's only the Intellectual property rights, then the Intellectual property, and finally, the Intellectual.

I am intensively envious of people who type this fast; I get up to 100 words per minute on a good day. Time to get a new pair of hands?

> It seems the developer works for Tailscale in an evangelist / developer relations role. I feel that ought to have been disclosed in this article.

Note that the author of gokrazy is Michael Stapelberg (perhaps better known for writing i3), who doesn't seem to be directly affiliated with Tailscale.

The linked article recommends installing Tailscale

the whole vtuber thing is not really for me, but i appreciate the effort that went into this presentation—did you make it all the way to <https://asahilina.net/agx-exploit/#/demoslide>?

Now this I can understand—why would you do that?!

Where's my beef tallow LLM?

> What drives me nuts is autocomplete, because it pops things into my vision automagically while I'm trying to focus on the code, and even effects a mode change (some keys do different things when autocomplete is active).

Totally agree! I disable "press Enter to accept suggestion" in JetBrains IDEs for this reason.