Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fc_barnes's commentslogin

Parent is a great example of how Republicans constantly lie:

1. Ignoring that POTUS literally told states to fend for themselves on supplies, even pretending he didn’t. Obvious lie.

2. Pretending that the seizure is part of an undeclared federal supply management effort, when it is clearly more likely that these seizures are about political revenge, favoritism, and graft.

This sort of routine lying is positive evidence that all Republicans are in fact aware that their chosen party has descended into rank criminally and that they are knowingly and actively aiding the commission of felonies, i.e. they are guilty of the crime of conspiracy.

To the extent that these Republican antics are going to kill, for the pure sake of political revenge, citizens of blue states and states with Democratic governors, members of the Republican Party should not be surprised if they end up paying a very, very high price in the future.


The Republican Party is a criminal conspiracy.


Minneapolis field office memo.


What's this?


Not sure what OC meant. Googling led me to https://oig.justice.gov/special/s0606/chapter1.htm


Reminder that markets are human creations and not some natural phenomenon.


But the marketing is nonetheless deceptive. Apple’s practices are much less stringent, and their cooperation with law enforcement much greater, than their marketing and even their privacy pages suggest.

This is a crappy place to turn around and tell your customers, “should’ve read the fine print!”


If your threat model includes pointed requested from law enforcement, then you probably shouldn’t be using any consumer internet products wholesale.


I hope this makes it to the top so ngate can write about it...


I'm confused about who sees what IP when. I'm also confused about the bandwidth limits on plus. Having essentially two products blended together, and using new technology that behaves uniquely, makes the communication lift here that much heavier.


Plus uses their priate backbone, so it costs them money to send traffic through it.

The IP discovery is currently only available for CF websites: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21070828


So you basically didn't read the article, or it passed right over your head if you did...


Could you rephrase that in a way that isn't so insulting that it makes me just want to ignore you?


I'm curious why this got flagged? It's a pretty interesting snapshot of the political dynamics around the second amendment, especially with the way other groups have been dealing with them.


Nobody has 0 intake, that is a useless control; nor would any IRB sign off on such a study, because it would be harmful to the subjects.


> Nobody has 0 intake

And thus we have ourselves a quandary, but truth isn't diminished by the practical limits of safe experimentation. We don't have to lie just because.

> it would be harmful to the subjects.

That doesn't make the title precise or the observation inapt.


The experiment itself may be useless control; most people get D vitamins from the sun. How do we know the cohorts got the same D from sun exposure?


Should use a blood tests for vitamin D status, probably calcium, phosphate and K too instead of relying on self reported diet.


If you avoid animal foods the only dietary vitamin D really is from fortified products. However we also synthesize it, albeit poorly as adults, particularly with lower exposure to the sun.


Plenty of people have 0 supplementation though.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: