2. He tried getting some GPL software relicensed as Apache under false pretenses.
But this is what confuses me. If you don't want this happening, why license your code as Apache?
If Samsung would have done this, this would have been hailed as a success of non-copyleft licenses (like when MS used BSD's network stack). Why do they have a problem when a core dev does is?
The only feature from CM that I miss is the ability to hold the volume up button to skip to the next track (as a global option, not just a per-app thing). Everything else that they did so well has pretty much been added to stock android.
2. He tried getting some GPL software relicensed as Apache under false pretenses.
But this is what confuses me. If you don't want this happening, why license your code as Apache?
If Samsung would have done this, this would have been hailed as a success of non-copyleft licenses (like when MS used BSD's network stack). Why do they have a problem when a core dev does is?