Family Guy: https://youtu.be/k_AMQOTPqL8?si=j0fjQfmS-GcEP8Hj

And https://youtu.be/OsSJnV7Ik9o?si=7aXnOKN8Jc28h-Mo

I'm a private citizen. On my house we have an ALPR Axis camera pointing down the street (in addition to Axis cameras around the whole perimiter.) And when the police ask, we almost always provide them with data. I feel perfectly justified doing this, and we've helped solved several crimes.

Most people would do the same in your situation, we should expect citizens to want to help victims of crime, especially crimes against the person.

However I think there’s a significant difference between a single household and a centralised network of cameras across dozens of states.

For me the core issue of this is private enterprise holding gigantic amounts of PII, and the forms that is taking.

While I'm not sure about this ban, _something_ is causing normally nice, peaceful Australia to be somewhere I don't feel safe anymore. My relatives in Melbourne have left, after being physically attacked and had their property vandalized by mostly young "activist" types who, no doubt, get all their news from social media.

This is actually a major nitpick. If this "study" is this sloppy, what else isn't quite true?

I am a little confused, why would sloppiness in the media release (the article that uses the word tailpipe), have anything to do with sloppiness in the study, which the above comment clearly highlights is about PM2.5, not specifically tailpipe emissions?

Are Yale's media releases typically done by the people who do the study?

The study isn’t sloppy, and I would highly suggest reading it before casting aspersions at the authors:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s44407-025-00037-2

The study doesn't mention tailpipes (afiact). This press release/article does. Don't dismiss scientists because journalists reporting their findings incorrectly.

Sometimes AI gives such a surprising or unusual answer to a question that it's worth a discussion. I think it should be discouraged but not "forbidden".

I would love to see this run during an extended bear market period.

Cant the model go short in a bear market?