Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fourneau's commentslogin

I -have- built something like this for the TV using NFC cards, which was a great first-electronics-project for myself. That said, the most frustrating part is not the actual hardware itself but getting whatever streamer you're using to play the content you want. For example, this project required the author to WireShark and reverse engineer how Chromecast managed things.

If you do go down this route, I found that Plex offered the best deep-linking functionality and would wrap all of your content with that... but it was still somewhat unreliable.


I wanted to create something for my daughter that could just play a particular one of a curated set of programs on demand, but there are so many apps for different services, it;s so hard to know how to begin to control them all.


Is this available to replicate? I've been thinking about this for some time, for music albums, specifically.


Definitely indie. It was a solo project until launch.


It's an epic story. Grinding on a solo project for 4 years is pretty daunting, I'm glad the universe rewarded him.


Serious question: why do you find it dodgy?


If you look closely, there's an ad in the picture where the fridge's clock says 12:30.

"Shop Samsung Water Filters - Subscribe and Save 40%"


We should start a club with the amount of us in the same boat... what should our domain be?


Matchmaking service for swapping unused domains with other side project hobbyists.


lol, that might actually work!


underconstruction.com


www.awebsiteyouwillnevergoto.org


foreverwip.com


ghostridingthewip.ai


projectgraveyard.org seems to be available


To this point, I've been using Qobuz as an alternative and it's recommendation engine is laughably bad, but the experience is somehow better. I'll get the most random songs pop up in the list, and sometimes it's a very pleasant surprise.

In the world of music discovery a bad recommendation engine is maybe better than a hyper-fine-tuned one.


FWIW good old Pandora now has options to influence their how their stations explore (so, you can for example pick “discovery” to have it try and find similar artists it hasn’t shown you as often).


I've been working on a small side project on-and-off for the last year and some. The state-of-the-art decisions I made last year are already dead. There's a new version of everything, and everything was a breaking change, nothing is backwards compatible.

How do people live like this?


They don't. They say fuck it and learn a trade.


Claude 3.5 is a trusted developer partner that will work with you and outline what it’s thinking. It’s not always right but because it outlines its reasoning you too can reason about the problem and catch it.

ChatGPT, for me, was a stack overflow solution dump. It gives me an answer that probably could work but it’s difficult for me to reason about why I want to do it that way.

Truthfully this probably boils down to prompting but Claude’s out of the box experience is fantastic for development. Ultimately I just want to code, not be a prompt wizard.


Since a lot of people don't remember / haven't played the game, here are the details that can help you:

- You can determine drunken state using the game's front-end API. They call debuffs/buffs 'auras' and you can match it against a specific set of drunken aura ids. - The game will randomly add Hs and iirc the word "hic" to a sentence in order to emulate drunkenness.

Personally, I like the checksum solution the best -- don't even try to be smart, just validate the integrity of the message. This also solves issues where your message gets truncated, or other problems arise. They also likely had to break up their messages across multiple chat messages (there's chat limit) so a checksum goes a long way here.


This is the cleanest solution, IMO, rather than having to check each word/key/whatever of your protocol.


Depending on how the message is changed you might not be able to trust the checksum as well


A checksum is usually intended not to match if the checksum itself is corrupted.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: