Hmm, an interesting notion! I certainly could see the popularity of encouraging others to do something they already like doing [and who but a monk doesn't enjoy the occasional judge fest?]
Would there be any option down the line to find out what the guilt-weight for a particular action was?
Julian, there are quite a bit of typos on your site. Copy with typos doesn't lend credibility. Would you like some assistance with proofreading?
Congratulations on your work, and I think the site is a good idea.
I wonder: perhaps since you're offering your site as an alternative to broscience [as linked] you could use phrases like "we believe" or "it is theorized" or support your nutritional claims with the science behind them.
For instance you say that it is a good idea to supplement omega fats, despite getting plenty of them in the diet. There are those who would disagree and say that as long as you're maintaining ~1:1-1:3 ratios of o3:o6 you're a-ok.
Would there be any option down the line to find out what the guilt-weight for a particular action was?