Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | goodmachine's commentslogin

Well, you nailed it there. Nice work


Wonderful essay! OP's tireless research is appreciated.


Yes. Amazing read. This is the kind of content I come to hacker news for.


A message from the Skype CEO [NSFW]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZI0w_pwZY3E


That was great :)


"In fact, people have actually made spatial pattern generators that allow you to input the frequency profile that you want, and get the corresponding point pattern out. It’s really quite neat, and I highly recommend reading this paper so you can see some other possible noise parameters, like anisotropy."

I had to hunt this 'custom colour' noise paper out since that link was dead. It is quite neat. Here it is on ACM in case anyone else is interested:

Point Sampling with General Noise Spectrum (2012) https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2185520.2185572


Non-paywalled version on one of the authors' site:

https://www.liyiwei.org/papers/noise-sig12/


Hmmm... this is trash. All images are called 'downloaded_image.jpeg' which is hilarious.

Who created the image? When? Where? How can I find more from the same book, or by the same artist?

Cultural amnesia is one thing, but annihilating the credits and context deliberately is very bad indeed.

Pinterest does this evil trick, and Cosmos bills itself as 'Pinterest for creatives' = pure internet cancer.


https://cep.museepicassoparis.fr/

Great resource, terrible site.

Why can't any serious museum create a good, simple image gallery? Low resolution, missing images, curatorial cruft, bad UI, dead ends.

Just show me the work. It shouldn't be so hard to use.


Why can't any serious museum create a good, simple image gallery?

I like this one: https://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/en/collection?q=&Artist=Vincent...


In order for that not to happen (uninterpretable ML models) some research on symbolic distillation, aka symbolic regression

https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11287

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aay2631


As Gorard has long been at pains to point out (and Wolfram, being preternaturally immodest, has not) the model is a formalism, not a theory.

That said, the point of redescribing things we know very well - like QM and GR - in new ways is ultimately to make testable predictions. So:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLtxXkugd5w


IANAM but I guess the name for mining OEIS or generating scads of data iteratively for analysis would be empirical mathematics.

It's empirical metamathematics if you attempt this with networks of axioms/theories

https://www.wolframscience.com/metamathematics/empirical-met...

https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2020/09/the-empirical-me...


+1 for human presence. I agree with the commenter upthread that it feels off-puttingly impersonal. Show me the faces!

Otherwise, I totally get the problem you're trying to solve so I poked it and quite liked it.

As someone with 2091 years worth of Slack convos (and Slack wanting me to upgrade to export them) can you let me know how you handle imports and exports?


You can install the Struct bot in Slack: https://struct.ai/install-slack -- This would by default pick up the last 3 months of conversations (we do this to decrease the unpaid load on GPT). You can ping us and we can help sync it from the beginning of whatever history Slack shows.

We don't have an exporter yet, but can surely put one together which provides a SQL / CSV formatted output (or whatever works best for users). We would never charge for exports.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: