Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | guoqiang2's commentslogin

More pic/videos from live search from weibo.com : http://weibo.com/p/1008087bef7c8c2cd3e28667d7cbf6ed9a7c4b

http://s.weibo.com/weibo/%20%E5%A4%A9%E6%B4%A5%E5%A1%98%E6%B...

People injured and hospitals around are full of patients...


The first link currently redirects to a login page, FYI. The second one is okay.


Didn't go through this TLDR writing, but just briefly scrolling the page.

I was so amazed the author can connect Ai Weiwei with the WildCat robot, an image of Obama's calling from a camp, and a kid in a car using Disney product.

How this can connect together?!

If you want to talk about surveillance or privacy, won't NSA's Snowden be a more famous and impacting example?


Read the damn article. The author goes through many examples of things that are eroding privacy.

Ai Weiwei lives under total surveillance. Google is producing technology for the military. Obama has to use a tent in his hotel room to block surveillance. The disney wristband tracks your movements and spending.

Surprisingly the NSA is barely mentioned at all. The author is primarily concerned with how technology is enabling surveillance, not the organizations currently using it.


What technology is google producing for the military?


Boston Dynamics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Google, produced the WildCat robot for DARPA's Maximum Mobility and Manipulation (M3) program[0].

[0] http://www.darpa.mil/our_work/dso/programs/maximum_mobility_...


Most of that work was done before Google bought the company, and Google is not renewing those contracts.

Google is not a defense contractor. As frequently beaten as a dead horse on HN, Google sells ads, not weapons.

DARPA funds lots of projects that eventually get inherited by the private sector. SIRI funding at SRI was provided by DARPA, does that make Apple a defense contractor?

Guilt by association usually produces bad analysis.


That's somewhat misleading. Boston Dynamics made those robots for DARPA before Google acquired them. After Google acquired them, they announced that they would not seek further military contracts in the future.


I would guess that many HN readers tripped over the Boston Dynamics example because it doesn't seem to fit with this talk's overall theme of surveillance. Of course we all recognize Google is doing a tremendous amount of mining and predicting, but they aren't sending out cat-bots to collect the data, which makes it a bit of a non-sequitur.


FTA:

>One of the technologies the NSA uses for this feat is made by Pittsburgh Pattern Recognition (‘PittPatt’), now owned by Google. We underestimate how much a company like Google is already part of the military industrial complex. I therefore can’t resist showing a new piece of Google technology: the military robot ‘WildCat’ made by Boston Dynamics which was bought by Google in December 2013.


> Didn't go through this TLDR writing, but just briefly scrolling the page.

> How this can connect together?!


The connection is lack of privacy.



Thanks, this is very informative.


I am gonna to use this password, super strengthful... "intheworldworldworldworldworld"


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: