Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | infp_arborist's commentslogin

That sounds like role-reversal. Securely attached people are more flexible (than avoidant or helpless) in both receiving and giving.


With AGI supposedly around the corner and (more realistically) current LLMs performing at least incrementally better -- why are we even thinking that Microsoft's or Google's solutions will provide enough value vs competitors in 3, 5 or 10 years? Cheaper or free alternatives might soon reach feature parity, and even previously complicated deployment is now aided by AI.


No one cares


Multiple years of AGI around the corner and still no demonstrated improvement in submissions to FOSS projects. If anything it's slowed them down by wasting maintainer time reviewing slop.


Thats a skill issue. Maintainers can get through a whole lot more than ever before because they can review PR much faster. Thats great for velocity. Features still need that expert touch since no software system is simple but it is getting easier.


Re. 2 - I find it fascinating that people using coding agents have seemingly no problem to reveal their full codebases to AI companies.


Can you clearly articulate me why they should have a problem?

If you don't want training on your codebase, many AI companies offer this option. What's the issue?


For the biggest part of my life it seemed that all these technical accomplishments were the work of untouchable geniuses, but reading this story is also very telling about the value of long-term friendship and financial/societal stability to support each other's explorations.


Bad example. Linus is a genius.


Less techy, but how about personal relationships you can trust?


So I am guessing if we teach teenage girls (and future mothers) nonviolent communication, we will have peace in our communities in a couple of generations?


If by 'peace' you mean the coercive control, manipulation and emotional exploitation of those around you, perhaps.


This is a dark view on non violent communication. I don't think it is as useful as it's proponents says, but surely you give it way more power and intent that those techniques really have, no ?


You can argue whether it is manipulative, but you can not deny "the intent" here. You you read up technique and then apply it, the conscious intent is 100% there. You made an active choice and went out of your way to enact it.


I can deny the intent to be exploitative and coercive.

Really I don't see how. I would like an example, i have learned sales techniques and to me even sales techniques, who are multiple order of magnitude more manipulative imho, aren't really coercive . Also, sales techniques works way better on persons not aware of them, non-violent communication mostly work if both persons use it (that makes it way less actionable than it's proponents affirm), which is to me the opposite of exploitative.


Maybe you have jist shifted what you allow yourself to see as coercive and manipulative in the process of accepting sales techniques.


wouldn't this be easy to control for by mostly offering names from the same ethnic background?


I really appreciate George Haas as a meditation teacher. He specializes in those of us who are "f*cked up the most" (i.e. attachment disturbances)


"Friends" by Robin Dunbar explains that pretty well. Highly recommended.


Just a reminder that BallisticNG is an equally addictive Wipeout clone and available on all Steam platforms. A Nintendo Switch port was also announced.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/473770/BallisticNG/


No news on the Switch version after 2.5 years?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: