It would be really interesting to see the list of people who flag these news. At this point, I mostly browse HN by clicking on COMMENTS so I can see the actual stories that got flagged (that always have to do about democracy being eroded by Trump)
Only the mods know who they are and a that point, deleting your account is a better move than leaving any potential internet footprints if they are truly scared.
So no, then it clearly wasn't about shipping lanes and freedom of navigation but just about taking the credit. After all if Israel was going to do it instead it could simply be solved by waiting a little bit. These guys are super transactional and they were afraid they missed the moment that would allow them to take credit and use it as coin for exchange.
Israel tried already if you recall and clearly they couldn't though they certainly tried their hand at shock and awing. The transactional aspect is vis-a-vis Egypt.
Egypt is bleeding money because of loss of transit fees. However, this Muslim Brotherhood wary nation is not keen on the announced ethnic cleansing in Gaza (to Sinai). So this could be inducement to have them host an open air concentration camp with guarantees that navigation through the Suez Canal will resume.
> Do you realize that if the USA had been run the way you advocate that you'd never have lived there in the first place?
Of course! But I’m not a child and I’m capable of conceiving of what would be “good” separate and apart from what would be “good for me.”
Indeed, as someone with a large south asian family that immigrated to the U.S./Canada/Australia, and who is especially well acquainted with Anglo-Protestant culture, I’m particularly well positioned to form the opinions that: (1) assimilation is slow and doesn’t happen completely; and (2) even high skill immigration, at scale, isn’t conducive to maintaining our american participatory democracy.
So, I spent some days mulling over my answer. For many years I've considered you to be one of my friends on HN and it has been a pretty sad affair to see you slide further and further down in your values and ethics. That's why I did not want to just flip you off with a snide remark but to try to explain to you why I think you are very much in the wrong here and about many things in general. You claim you are 'a smart person' but your intelligence has been hijacked to work against you.
It seems that you think that because you are a 'legal immigrant' or descendant of such that you are somehow better or more proper than an illegal immigrant. This is funny because the people you vote for only see that distinction as a temporary item on their checklist. That's how they got you to vote them into power. Now that they are in power and once they are done with the items higher on their to do list (and which they need in order to further consolidate their power) they are going to move down the list. And one of those items includes you: people of color in general, and with 'of color' I mean even slightly non-white. This includes you, your parents and your children. Especially educated people of color who could conceivably put up a solid defense. And their extended family is on that same list because they too do not pass the purity test.
Sooner or later they will make their move. And by then of course you are welcome to cling to your belief that the law will protect you. But these people don't actually care all that much about the law. So what has happened here is that you have become in part radicalized, your strong feelings about one particular subject has caused you to lose sight of the long term strategic goals that the people that you vote for have made perfectly clear. And effectively you've helped them to act against you and the group that you should stand in defense for: immigrants, legal or otherwise.
Because the fact that you went the legal way contains a massive assumption: that the legal way is the reasonable way. It isn't necessarily so and enshrined in the US values is the dream of living a happy life. That is something far more universal than the reality as drawn by lines on a map and of course people are going to seek that even if they are forbidden to do so by a technicality of law.
The USA is built on immigrants. Immigrants that pull the ladder up after they have arrived - legal or otherwise - are part of the problem, not the solution because they define themselves as the in-group and all of those who would like to follow in their footsteps as the out-group. This on account of assimilation (who cares, that's the next generation's problem) or some other bogeyman.
And finally, your 'American participation democracy' is under siege, but not from immigrants (unless we count Elon Musk as one of those). Wake up and stop your slide into the abyss before it is too late, so that there are still people left to defend you when the knock on the door comes.
> It seems that you think that because you are a 'legal immigrant' or descendant of such that you are somehow better or more proper than an illegal immigrant. This is funny because the people you vote for only see that distinction as a temporary item on their checklist. That's how they got you to vote them into power. Now that they are in power and once they are done with the items higher on their to do list (and which they need in order to further consolidate their power) they are going to move down the list. And one of those items includes you: people of color in general, and with 'of color' I mean even slightly non-white. This includes you, your parents and your children. Especially educated people of color who could conceivably put up a solid defense. And their extended family is on that same list because they too do not pass the purity test.
So if last year a person votes for JD Vance to be VP, you are saying they voted for someone who is secretly planning to harm his own wife and kids? And if next year someone votes for Vivek Ramaswamy to be Governor of Ohio, you are saying they are voting for someone who’s secretly planning to harm not just his wife and kids, but also himself?
Trump has endorsed many “even slightly non-white people”, from Ramaswamy to be Governor of Ohio, to Mehmet Oz’s unsuccessful campaign to become Senator for Pennsylvania and Herschel Walker’s (also unsuccessful) campaign to be Senator for Georgia. He’s also nominated Walker to be Ambassador to the Bahamas, installed Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence, Lori Chavez-DeRemer as Secretary of Labor, Scott Turner as Secretary of HUD… but you’re saying that elevating them to high office is all part of Trump’s grand plan to harm them?
So is it going to be Kubernetes as the IaC stack from now on? I'm asking as a heads up as I foresee a potential major demand for infrastructure migrations in the future.
Not unless its heavily modified to scale past 10k nodes sensibly. its security/secrets model also needs a boatload of work before you can think about hosting untrusted parties on your kit.
Nuh uh! Hacker News told me that American businesses have the ultimate moral imperative to cease operations in any country that demands invasive control of my devices.
Surely my smartphone OEM would fight the entire American government before handing over my data.
Except 90% of modern day Germans would not go out and bring Nazi salutes, dream of empire and try to turn one of the worlds superpowers into a technocracy.
I agree. But: I wonder how long ago his fascination with all things Nazi started and the whole 'X' thing goes back a long, long time. So this may not be a recent thing at all.
His maternal grandfather was an ardent supporter of nazi ideals, boosted the Protocols of Zion, and moved to the aparthied South African regime as they had "the right idea". His paternal grandfather was less so but leaned that way and was foreign minister in the SA Government defending aparthied.
Elon's maternal grandfather died when he was young but apparently his maternal grandmother had a great influence on him and was likely a fellow traveller living in a house that celebrated all things Nazi.
reply