Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jamesmccann's commentslogin

You can sign records in a normal database. Implement some segregation of duty and don't give your DB admins access to any signing keys.


They can still delete records, restore from backups, etc


I don't think these are comparable though. Compiler generation is deterministic and more or less provably correct. LLM code is a mile away from that.


I think Tachyons struck the balance to be honest. Tailwind's "functions" and combinations seem to allow a higher level of complexity where it becomes difficult to quickly inspect a class block after some time has passed.


This is a cool project! One small suggestion: the native blue links for the author name, "thread", and "reply" make the content hard to focus on as the UI is quite intrusive. HN solves this quite well with a colour scheme that has the comment content as the most prominent element in a thread.


> We shouldn't limit ourselves because of climate change. We should instead improve the technology and make it better so it doesn't impact the climate in such a way it becomes unsustainable.

I think we totally should limit ourselves from the idea that it's totally normal to expect to be able to fly anywhere in the world in ~24 hours and to do this regularly.


Why though? Let's imagine we could create an electric plane for example and produce the electricity it uses completely carbon free.

Why would that be an issue? I think this is totally doable, if we desire.


Sure. Do it.

Given that this is apparently possible, there should be no problems with a 1000% carbon tax on non-electric planes starting tomorrow, right?


The only issue I have with that is there may be other engines which are not electric but could still provide the same benefits.


Usually I add "reddit" to the search phrase and try to find threads / user-generated and hopefully more organic content this way.


reddit is good, and so is just "forum" which will turn up specialty forums that haven't been absorbed by one of the Borgs yet.


Really enjoyed reading this article as a Sunday afternoon long-read. Well structured and covers a lot of things I have experienced but haven't formed into such a clear description. Also really appreciate the realistic examples!


Thank you! Yes it took me a long time to write and thinking about good examples is always hard...


The styling of the nav and pages here looks strangely refreshing, props.


Meanwhile, we out here obsessing about making money on BTC...


There are folks who on purpose do not participate in BTC because they know the energy consumption is wrong. Go tell people about it and they might get it.


I don't participate in BTC because I find the whole thing hilarious.

Between it's inability to work as a payment method at scale (transactions per minute), exchanges running off with client bitcoins, exchanges getting broken into constantly and the shady way it's handled when that happens and on and on.

I'm not saying the idea is fundamentally useless (clearly) but the implementation is terrible.

I might be wrong and in 20 years I'll be getting paid in BTC but I'd bet that isn't the case.


And they make their snide observations from where? That's right, their computers. How much energy is spent consuming and deliving Facebook? Or iOS games?


There is indeed a lot of engery spent elsewhere - your comment is pure whataboutism though.

A single Bitcoin transaction currently use as much engery as energy spent in a single home for days.


Depends where their electricity is coming from, doesn't it?


What a pathetic argument. Do you realize how much energy is used to maintain existing computers systems used by banks for all their fake fiat currency?


Again - pure whataboutism here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

There are multiple reports now out detailing and comparing energy use of traditional transactional fiat money vs. the new schemes


Same thoughts on my side. And we're mostly doing nothing to stop the growing catastrophe. And I am no exception to that, ...just to be honest.


Given that bitcoin can be boiled down to essentially a Chinese energy index, these two things are not unrelated.


There will always be terrible things happening in the world. That doesn't mean we should only work on those problems at the expense of everything else.


That’s just an empty sop to a blistered conscience.


Do you need a video to tell you to switch to the front facing camera to take a selfie?


Some people just never notice certain parts of UI. There are millions and millions of people with iPhones and there is likely going to be someone who just learned about the camera-switching icon for the first time.

Plus, that same video showed people that you can use the volume buttons as shutter buttons which is something most people likely don't know about.


it's not they don't notice, they don't care and don't use all the functionnality. They are quite stupid. (feel free to downvote me) but I think the same, "how to do simple" things is useless. If the user don't want learn something new, why they will see a video about it?


I agree with your sentiment, in the same way that people are described as stupid in here: https://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/misused.html

At the end of the day, UIs are unnatural interfaces. Skeumorphism only makes things worse. So UX design can only meet the user half way; intelligence must be employed to get the most out of an interface.

I see these videos as akin to using a TV remote instead of getting up to change the channel: people are lazy, so appeal to that laziness (along with the whole "here have some pro resources" thing as well) as a form of sales.

It's brilliant.


> Skeumorphism only makes things worse.

To unlock an iPhone you had to slide the lock, which is similar to how you'd open (old) doors. Isn't in this case skeumorphism helpful?


Very useful, I really liked that design. (If anything, I wish there had've been a little "notch" cut above the right edge, so that once you move the slider over and the top and bottom parts animate out the edges of the screen, it would look like the slider was moving through the notch. Hopefully that made sense. I do realize that such a visual design would have been just confusing enough that it would never have been approved, though.)

This is sort of what I was getting at - I just found this article, but it's quite balanced. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2012/11/...


I didn't know the story about social security cards. Thanks for sharing.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: