Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | janimo's comments login

According to Our world in data wild terrestrial mammals make up 2% of the total number of mammals (in biomass so it is not exactly headcount, but also includes predators and rodents not strictly herbivores), while cattle, pigs, goats and sheep are >50%. So when looking at suffering you may want to take scale into account.


Much more thoughtful than yesterday's blog post addressing Moxie's concerns.

I wonder if the quality of conversations around this subject were improved if similarly to conflicts of interest declared by scientific paper authors, each public critic or supporter of web3 would disclose whether they are currently financially invested in 'crypto'. For outsiders it's harder to tell apart hacker/geek types from speculators and lurkers (not that there couldn't be an overlap). The fact that this article mentions there exist much fewer Ethereum nodes than "Ethereum nerds" may suggest that the non-technical group controls the public discourse and expectations.


It depends on who you’re reading: people building actual products and protocols will usually provide measured responses and be able to engage properly with good-faith criticism. See also Vitalik’s Reddit post responding to Moxie’s article.

On the other hand, if you encounter primarily spammers, speculators, and scammers, you’ll just get garbage (similar to anti-blockchain grifters that repeat the same “blockchain is a ponzi pyramid earth-burning scam” garbage repeatedly)


An inverse relationship here. The builders are busy building stuff and don't spend much time on communications. Whereas speculators, all they have is communications, and there are many more speculators than builders, so the incentives look like 99% crap, 1% useful communications.

Props to builders like the OP, Moxie, and Vitalik for building and sharing. And to podcasts like Bankless for creating venues for communication from builders. I'd love to find a "Builders" cryptocurrency podcast.


Look at the ZeroKnowledge podcast; it’s fantastic and has no scammy bullshit


https://zeroknowledge.fm/

This is excellent, listening to the Flashbots interview now: https://zeroknowledge.fm/168-2/ (urls dont have podcast title)


Thank you!


one difference is that authoritarian regimes have been known to infuse everything with state propaganda, whereas almost nobody expects this from western democracies, showing just how much more subtle and even effective the latter can be.


>whereas almost nobody expects this from western democracies

Are you joking? Ever since 9/11 the US has been pumping out propaganda disguised as entertainment like gangbusters! It's really obvious when you go and watch reruns of old copaganda shows from 03 to 06, and then there's "24". Of course there's also blatant ra-ra Military propaganda like J.A.G. and NCIS

It's not surprising to see outright propaganda from the US, it's surprising how many decades it's taken for people to begin to call it what it is. Surprising and depressing.


What you wrote is true, but it's astonishing how people tolerate having an industrial production of propaganda (since WW2) in what should be a democracy.


Democracy and propaganda aren't mutually exclusive. Plus, the US isn't a democracy. In fact, most countries banging the democracy-propaganda-horn aren't actually democracies. Austria, for example, is a Republic. Democracy is just a smokescreen.


> ... aren't actually democracies. Austria, for example, is a Republic

"republic" and "democracy" are in no way mutually exclusive terms.

On the contrary, the overlap very often. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic for a definition.


seconded.


A tie between two well known books: "The making of the atomic bomb" and "Manufacturing consent". Both great in very different ways.


Manufacturing Consent is a good one -- the thesis sounds straightforward enough, but walking through it feels like having one's third eye opened.


Sarno's book, mentioned in other comments was also on YC's reading list a while ago: https://blog.ycombinator.com/ycs-2017-summer-reading-list/


How portable are these techniques to other architectures? Could >100 FPS be realistically achieved today using only CPUs or mobile phones?


> Could >100 FPS be realistically achieved today using only CPUs or mobile phones?

Not yet.

Google's MediaPipe object detector (which is one of the most optimised mobile solutions around) can do "26fps on an Adreno 650 mobile GPU"[1].

The Adreno 650 is the GPU in the Snapdragon 865, ie the current high end SOC used by most non-Apple phones. This gives roughly the same performance as an iPhone 11.

[1] https://google.github.io/mediapipe/solutions/objectron.html

[2] https://www.tweaktown.com/news/69097/qualcomm-adreno-650-gpu...

[3] https://www.tomsguide.com/news/snapdragon-865-benchmarks


Thanks for the links. I think there also isn't an API for accessing high FPS cameras on Android devices that support slow motion video capture.


Converting to ONNX gives you advantage in Intel CPU too, if you convert from ONNX to OpenVINO.


Mobile phones definitely since these days most of them have pretty powerful GPUs.


Logged in just to say congrats, this attitude is seldom encountered, even among those building their products almost entirely on freely available foundations.


That’s the craziest thing to me. There’s no reason OSS has to be a thing. Here’s to hoping greed never kills it.


Being compensated for one’s efforts isn’t greed, and for-profit software can also be open-source.

To each their own. It’s a cool project.

I’ve spent a lot of time contributing to OSS, created popular OSS projects, and I felt pretty shitty when I realized other companies were using the software to make money and I hadn’t done anything to ensure I was compensated.


Not at all, I was more speaking to companies that lean heavily on OSS without giving back, which sounds like your experience. Would love to pick your brain sometime if you’re open to sharing any lessons you’ve learned along the way.


When did Chrome stop supporting web speech to text?


It worked for me until recently. So a few months back... for android apps you need an app key, but there is no way to do that for a web app afaik, maybe if you used the google api instead of the standard web api. But i prefer platform independency and privacy over quality.


Something like this should play a role in the future of more sustainable clothing/fashion.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: