There is an amazing amount of hand waiving and conjecture in this discussion.

Your comment is very dismissive and hand-wavy. What do you think your conjecture has contributed to the discussion?

Dan is correct (naturally); depending on complexity and scope redux can be a drag. For a small project I will use an event emitter to communicate state change requests to my top level component. These sort of things tend to only have a handful of components anyhow.

I've found that being considered a 'competent engineer' merely means 'never too arrogant to learn'.

I didn't know half of the stuff in grandparents' post.

I was attempting to confirm that these are all points are important. Being too arrogant to learn and being in incompetent are two entirely different things.

Sorry, I misunderstood. To me, your response came across as a "well, duh!".

No problem; as I read it back to myself I can see how it came across that way.

So long as you don't use JSX you certainly never need to transpire. I believe there is also a shim to do client side jsx parsing but is not encouraged for use with prod code

Wait, square brackets/parens indicates data binding direction in vanilla js? Huh?

Cyberpunk...or wait...Shadowrun!

Definitely feels like a variation of Shadowrun.

Except it's inverted. Shadowrun is cyberpunk with orcs and elves. This is orcs and elves with cyberpunk.

I honestly prefer Netrunner. I'd rather keep my fantasy and cyberpunk settings a little separate.

True! I realized that sometime after my comment but neglected to edit

Some employers allow a waiver against IP ownership of existing side projects related to the industry.

Despite all the hand waiving about accuracy of the claims or the efficacy of CDN fronted caching, etc etc, it is good to see more initiatives around saving (especially mobile) bandwidth use. After moving from EE into full stack js I've been blown away as the duplication present

100' is a very low distance for real IoT applications I've run across

A directional antenna at the active wifi radio would enable longer range. One interesting application would be the ability to dogleg a wireless connection between points A and B where there is no LoS to each other, but both have LoS with point C. It would be a low throughput link, but it would allow for an awesome implementation of a private two way communications system. I.e. Several miles without direct LoS between the two end points.

This is already a thing, however data rates tend to be slower

Yeah but it's easier to pair down the antenna and underpower the radio than to go the other direction :)

but 30m is way longer than I need for my IoT. It also makes my devices more secure from various attacks on my network, as less people can see it.

It'd be enough to achieve significant power reduction for the <100ft region though; pretty sure wifi modules would be able to support both passive and active modes depending on availability.

Idk, I just try to be reasonably fluent in the language...frameworks tend to play to one ideology or another and it seems just as important to pick one you understand as it is to pick one that purports to solve your problems better/faster/etc.