Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jmpman's commentslogin

I’ve wondered if something like this would drive down inflation in the US food supply.

I paid for FSD the first month it was offered monthly. Was so bad I wanted my money back but couldn’t figure out how to get Tesla to refund. Feel worse for those who paid the full $8k

It was $15k at the peak of Tesla hype. That's the cost of subscribing for 12.5 years.

You sound like my fellow citizens who have decided to use their theocratic power to push this view across my city and school. It impacts my children and their future mates. Sure, there’s an ideal world in which every person finds their ideal partner on the first time, falls madly in love and remains forever faithful. I don’t live in a Disney fantasy world, and would prefer public health policies are based on pragmatic principles.


If you prefer public health policies you prefer the solution for the lowest common denominator.


Back in the early 2000s I was programming on an IBM AIX server. Multicore, maybe multiprocessor and within the same machine, the clocks were skewed between the processors. If you’d dispatch a process, and then check its outstanding running time, it would differ depending upon which processor you’d check from, and of course it was a signed type, and then we would get negative values, which sent our code down the wrong path.


Once the US has air superiority, they don’t need their aircraft carriers anywhere close to Venezuela territory. The submarine fleet alone can enforce a blockade.


Point is, a blockade in and of itself is an act of war, and will get the corresponding response. You cannot hope to just starve them out. You can go full ham if you'd like, but that will also get a corresponding response. If you just want "a bit" of war, then you need to leave them an out.

All moot now, as anyone could have predicted, but it was fun to think about.


This seems like the most logical explanation.


I’m still waiting until I see little X Æ A-Xii playing in the street while Tesla Robotaxis deliver passengers before I buy these arguments. Until then, my children are playing in the street while these autonomous vehicles threaten their safety. I’m upset that this is forced upon the public by the government.


This would imply you feel the parent of said kid cares about said kid more than parent's company.


At this point he's just an anxious wreck on ketamine fully trusting a broken gut feel in each and every situation


My son was just scammed out of $1000 using some gift card scam. Typically these gift cards cannot be revoked once issued and anyone using the gift cards (like the people who scammed my son) would be able to reap the rewards without any consequences. I’m hopeful that Apple has found a way to track fraudulent Apple Gift cards and are now locking people’s Apple ID who use them. I suspect there’s more to the story than is being shared. What’s the provenance of the original gift card? Could it have been obtained through some not 100% above board means?


From other comments explaining the kind of scams running at the moment, one possible scenario is that the card may have been taken, tampered with by a scammer (and the code recorded), and then placed back in the supermarket, with the scammer waiting until the OP purchased it and it was activated at the checkout.

Perhaps between the scammer redeeming it and the poster then trying to redeem by entering the same code, the scammer’s account was flagged and then the OP’s account terminated along with the scammer for using the same code (even though the OP had done nothing wrong).


The card was purchased from a major brick-and-mortar retailer (Australians, think Woolworths scale; Americans, think Walmart scale)


Did the original poster claim that he bought it from Woolworths, or did someone else buy it? I question if the poster obtained the gift card from some path where the original purchaser may have been scammed.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Integrity_Field

This, along with RAID-1, is probably sufficient to catch the majority of errors. But realize that these are just probabilities - if the failure can happen on the first drive, it can also happen on the second. A merkle tree is commonly used to also protect against these scenarios.

Notice that using something like RAID-5 can result in data corruption migrating throughout the stripe when using certain write algorithms


The paranoid would also follow the write with a read command, setting the SCSI FUA (forced unit access) bit, requiring the disk to read from the physical media, and confirming the data is really written to that rotating rust. Trying to do similar in SATA or with NVMe drives might be more complicated, or maybe impossible. That’s the method to ensure your data is actually written to viable media and can be subsequently read.


Note that 99% of drives don't implement DIF.


I’ve seen disks do off track writes, dropped writes due to write channel failures, and dropped writes due to the media having been literally scrubbed off the platter previously. You need LBA seeded CRC to catch these failures along with a number of other checks. I get excited when people write about this in the industry. They’re extremely interesting failure modes that I’ve been lucky enough to have been exposed to, at volume, for a large fraction of my career.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: