This is easily observable in the idea that an artist refines his or her's own style. For example, I recently toured the Andy Warhol museum, and the progression of his style/projects were clearly showcased.
Certainly, people recognize him as having an intrinsic talent, but one that he built on to create some of the works for which he is most recognized.
I have used Guacamole as a solution to supporting remote desktop when the client location's firewall(s) allow nothing except port 80 and 443. Worked perfectly allowing users to connect to multiple desktops with no installation what so ever. Simply the perfect tool for what we needed and setup is a breeze once you familiarize yourself with the documentation.
A greater variety of gTLDs allow better descriptions of a site's purpose and function than the traditional gTLDs. I like them and hope that we see more in the future. Are there any downsides that I am missing?
I am currently utilizing both a .email and .io address.
What if the authoritative registry for such gTLDS give-up after seeing a low uptake? (Though I agree not all gTLDs are for commercial purposes.)
I am not sure what ICANN has planned for such contingencies or if there are some rules already set.
This is easily observable in the idea that an artist refines his or her's own style. For example, I recently toured the Andy Warhol museum, and the progression of his style/projects were clearly showcased.
Certainly, people recognize him as having an intrinsic talent, but one that he built on to create some of the works for which he is most recognized.