In this case, the existence of earth is an even number, so I don't see how this is a fallacy.

Take the sequence of prime numbers, with Earth = 2. ;)

I like my rm2, but 2 of my biggest issues are:

- Syncing changes I make to PDFs to Google drive is tedious

- For some reason there's a restriction of color when drawing on the PDF. Even if The tablet is black and white which is fine, I want to be able to select a wide range of colors since ultimately I'll want to be able to view the PDFs on a legit RGB computer.

What does this workflow look like on Daylight?

I think there’s a limit on colors purely because it’s already nearly impossible to distinguish them on the BW screen?

Yeah but I'll be viewing the PDF on my phone / computer, so being able to annotate in different colors even if the display is BW is important to me.

It's not at all like saying that. The concept of bridges is thousands of years old at this point with well established best practices, and a dense knowledge base on what can go wrong and how much damage can occur if built incorrectly. We aren't at the stage of "bridge innovation" where we don't even know what a bridge collapse looks like. We know very well the cost, threat to lives, even timeline that a poorly built bridge can cause.

I'm not against legislation regulating AI, but it needs to be targeted toward clear problems e.g.: stealing copyrighted material, profiling crime, face recognition, self driving vehicles, automated "targeting" however you want to interpret that.

I want to point out above are some awful uses of AI that are leveraged mostly by closed, proprietary entities

> No, human nerve cells are not "ridiculously simple." The idea that neurons = transistors is old-fashioned

That's not what the OP or the literal quote you pulled from them said. They said a single neuron is ridiculously simple _relative_ to what a clump of them can do.

I deleted my comment, it was a mistake to get involved in this conversation.