Text:
PromptAudit is a lightweight Markdown template and workflow that helps Prompt Architects and agentic coders review project documentation for contradictions, missing context, and unclear specs before code generation.
It standardises how we:
Summarise issues
Analyse context
Propose rewrites
Add verification steps
Prioritise fixes by severity
Drop it into any project and it doubles as a QA tool for human reviewers or autonomous agents.
I really like the track you are on with this. Love the features listed and there are so many scalable options for you as marketplace is becoming a major part of online sellers and local sellers lives. Can't up vote this enough.
Given how everyone uses TLS nowadays, a better analogy would be for the dealership to retain a copy of the key to your car after you buy it. Which would probably upset people but isn't as bad as having no lock at all.
There's probably enough data out already on how long hard drives last while mining Chia to make a reasonable estimate. It kills hard drives fast enough that a large percentage of hard drives which were mining at genesis are now dead.
There actually is an estimate of this floating in the chia Keybase channel. I remember it being very low, but there are many variables. Even at 100x the estimate it came down to less than 10 million USD in CO2 offsets.
I would really like to see a system where people pay on their ultimate currency of time - it’s something I have occasionally pondered where young fit and healthy people donate their time to help the elderly in order to gain ‘credits’ for when they are older to receive benefits or benefit in some way for when they are sick or require elderly assistance.
You can do this, but for many people it's hard to hang on to those credits until you're elderly and need to spend them on assistance. Also, the amount of care you'll need when you get to that point can vary over a large range, so it's hard to plan for.
People do this is Singapore and Australia with annuities and can elect to contribute more if they want but the flaw is that annuities are subject to the market and can be wiped out. It’s the same people have to hold onto these funds until they reach retirement age or meet certain criteria
I mean to be fair the current system is "a $400T financial timebomb". I think your parent comment was trying to imagine a system for taking care of the elderly that wasn't so entwined with existing financial markets.
I just don’t understand why people see this as the same thing - the value of money is always vulnerable to a myriad of factors however our moral interest towards each other seems (maybe I’m optimistic ) to be more consistent
How does one measure value and then store it? That's kind of the definition of money.
A money market account is insured and the real return is 0%, so it's not as vulnerable as you seem to think.
You can call money a credit. Then you can assign credits to actions and create a moral police to assign credits to people who do these actions and enter those credits into a leger. And now you've recreated communist China. Congrats.
All around, money is a better currency of exchange than time, or any other measure really. It measures well the actual value of time , effort, what have you. 1-to-1 time currency would be particularly bad choice, just imagine how much time you would have to pay back for someone who was born 60 years ago. Life was much much slower and unproductive. In the same amount of time today you can do multiple times the work/product that they did.
I still don’t understand why all of a sudden Craig Wright is wanting to unmask himself as satoshi.
It’s just strange - there was a reason to keep the founder of bitcoin private and now all of a sudden there is a reason this person claiming to be satoshi.
It standardises how we:
Summarise issues
Analyse context
Propose rewrites
Add verification steps
Prioritise fixes by severity
Drop it into any project and it doubles as a QA tool for human reviewers or autonomous agents.