Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | khomenko's commentslogin

that. there are no real parallels here.


"Customers who purchased kits before November 22, 2013 will continue to have access to all the reports they’ve always had."


Ahh interesting. At first I'd read that to mean that they weren't taking data down, and existing customers would still be able to access their reports. I figured that only applied to people who had already had a report generated.


Everyone who has ordered since November 22nd is offered a refund. The details are on the website and will come in the email. Have some faith, dude. Of course they have to do that.


Ah, well that's good then.


a) they never marketed themselves as predictors of cancer or told anyone they have major disease b) the criteria for scientific evidence are here https://23andme.https.internapcdn.net/res/pdf/HIC-SXIYiYqXre... (from https://www.23andme.com/for/scientists/)


Hmm - thanks for the link! Good stuff. I think the complaint I have is that in their advertising (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTIY310FGBU&list=TLdNSueMINq...), they feature:

- An individual for whom 23andMe correctly identified a heart issue that he later had.

- An individual who caught his prostate cancer early because 23andMe told him he was likely to have it.

In both cases, 23andMe successfully identified the condition before it occurred. That's about as close to marketing yourself as a predictor of disease as you can get. Granted, the word for word text in the video references "elevated risk", but the overall story they're selling to the public is that 23andMe predicts diseases you'll have. At least, that's my impression. Really interested to see how all this pans out.



Thanks, but that's only (OK, at least) an overview titled '23andMe Genetic Health Overview'.

Is there a more comprehensive and maybe configurable export feature available?


Yeah, you should be OK.



I think those petitions are highly dubious. Neither of them accurately references the FDA's issue with 23AM.


> highly dubious

See: most things on Change.org.


Yes, for the mendelian ones that can be inferred in a relatively straightforward way from the raw data. Not really, for the more complicated risk assessments.


You can run the raw data through a 3rd party tool like Promethease (http://snpedia.com/index.php/Promethease) while you wait for the FDA kerfuffle to work itself out. YMMV though.


It's a chicken and egg problem. The more people like you purchase the service, the less European it will become. It has made huge strides in the last couple of years, but there is a way to go still.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: