Had to log in to my rarely-used HN account to mention that I had played Biolab Disaster over and over again years back but lost track of it and forgot the name. Kinda wild to find it again by sheer luck!
Remember when the primary purpose of flatpak's shared runtimes was so that libraries like libwebp are not actually bundled per-application? libwebp in the runtimes has been patched with a fix for over a week.
These docs are a bit sparse and more for debugging some very specific things. If all you want is a stack trace:
- You can use `flatpak install --include-sdk --include-debug THE-APP` to install the SDK and debug info for an app
- Then `flatpak-coredumpctl -m MATCH THE-APP` will use coredumpctl to open the matching coredump inside the corresponding SDK's gdb
This gets mentioned basically every time. The gist is that:
- OpenGL is a much easier target to support, in terms of having a functional desktop. Remember, hardware-accelerated apps have been runnable on Asahi for months now, while Vulkan support is still a while away.
- Most of the work being done is common to OpenGL and Vulkan, so it's not exactly a ton of wasted effort.
By the creators of Penpot, free plan is basically only missing premium support. Not sure about the login though...there seem to be some plugins for it, not sure how that works with the hosted version?
We have a singular focus working only on Plane and making it big for everyone. We are still in early stages, so had to rush on few decisions, but we treat every user the same.
> Yes, because Brave is the model of ethics! Oh, wait a sec...
Short answer:
Well, compared to FF and the fine article that we are commenting on ... yes, it's certainly a model that FF could adopt!
Long answer: I don't see ads in Brave. I don't recall even installing any third parties to block ads. As far as the adtech space goes, Brave is indeed more ethical than FF (or Chrome, or Edge).
Now if you are of the view that, ethically, blocking ads is a bad thing, then I'm afraid we cannot actually discuss this any further, because there are very few arguments that will get me to change my mind about blocking advertisements, not least of which is the ad under discussion, i.e. "FULL-SCREEN-IN-YOUR-FACE-COVER-EVERYTHING-AND-STOP-THE-USER-FROM-DOING-ANYTHING-UNTIL-THE-AD-IS-DISMISSED" type of ad.