Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | krukah's commentslogin

Tree Of Life is nothing short of a masterpiece IMO. Influential on me personally as my first exposure to how much editing and structure (or lack thereof) build directorial style. It left an impression on me to feel so much for a film that explicitly says so little.

Obligatory mention of that iconic low-angle shot of The Mother floating gracefully across the plains. One of the best of all time.


The Tree of Life is singular to me as a piece of cinema, americana and a meditation on the beauty of life and especially childhood.

When I saw it the first time, I was so awestruck by the breathtaking cinematography and the incredible music, but even more so by the vision of it all. I had simply never seen anything like it.

I saw it another 4 times before it left theaters.


I should give Malick another shot. I love film, but only first tried him when I was much younger (Thin Red Line) and don’t think I really got it.

Never tried Tree of Life or any of his more recent stuff.

Got any recommendations in the first 2-3 of his you’d suggest?


Badlands and Days of Heaven are definitely his most conventional films and thus good starting points. Badlands especially is a great film, Days of Heaven is a bit uneven in terms of plot and pacing, but the cinematography is beautiful.

Then you have The Thin Red Line and The New World, which to me feel like a transitional period between the more conventional films and The Tree of Life, which is the first film that is characterized through and through by Malick's extremely divisive style. I personally love The Thin Red Line, but I can see why it's not for everyone. (I would skip The New World.) All later films have a very recognizable style, for which I think The Tree of Life is the best starting point.

Long story short: I'd start with Badlands, then watch The Thin Red Line, then The Tree of Life. If you like the last one, watch any of his later films.


I recommend turning on subtitles for Tree of Life. There's a lot of random whispered voice-overs, and without subs you'll have no idea who is speaking, let alone what they are saying.


I think that is at least partially intentional


Days of Heaven (1978)


I'd suggest Badlands (1973) and The New World (2005 (172 minutes version)) as the other two.

Badlands is his first movie and is very approachable.

The New World is also very approachable but can be long for some people. Personally, it's one of my all time favorite movies.and worth every minute.


I’m a huge Malick fan and agree that The New World is his masterpiece. I still remember seeing it in the cinema 20 years ago and almost levitating out of there. Just a beautiful piece of work. I’m glad there’s just about room for Malick somewhere in the film industry.


Or dive at the deep end and watch Knight of Cups or A Hidden Life. You will either like it or not, frankly I don't think it matters what you'll see first, I love all of his movies even though I didn't understand Thin Red Line when I was 20. But Knight of Cups hit me hard when I was 36.


I think referencing the well-known cases in cve-rs[1] is quite a bad faith effort. Of course if you try reeeally hard to write unsound code, you can write unsound code. An edge case in the type system downstream of lifetime variance rules is simply not something that matters in any practical attempt to write safe software. I find the tracker interesting since it probes the boundary of the compiler, but it says absolute nothing to the effect of "Rust is unsafe".

[1] https://github.com/Speykious/cve-rs


Novig | Multiple Roles | New York | Onsite | Full-time

Novig is rebuilding sports betting from first principles as a prediction market exchange. Legacy sportsbooks are extractive middlemen with misaligned incentives, dark patterns, and predatory mechanics. We're creating the alternative: a transparent exchange where users trade against each other at fair odds.

We're building core infrastructure around order routing, risk management, data pipelines, low-latency networking, and market integrity at scale. We write Rust extensively. We believe correctness, performance, and expressive code are necessities rather than luxuries. Ideal candidates care deeply about infrastructure, security, and performance. It certainly won't hurt to also care about prediction markets, traditional markets, or well-designed distributed systems.

Tech stack: Rust, Node, PostgreSQL, Kafka, Linux, distributed systems.

jobs@novig.co | https://job-boards.greenhouse.io/novig/jobs/4588745006


Monads are really undefeated. This particular application feels to me akin to wavefunction evolution? Density matrices as probability monads over Hilbert space, with unitary evolution as bind, measurement/collapse as pure/return. I guess everything just seems to rhyme under a category theory lens.



Maybe the (relative) lack of ecosystem has kept you away, but I really recommend checking out both Dioxus and Leptos. Leptos is incredibly similar to React, but with Rust ergonomics, and it's been a pleasure to learn and use. With an LLM by my side that knows React and Rust pretty well, I've found myself not even needing the React libraries that I thought I would, since I can easily build on the fly the features/components I actually need.

I too, eventually gave up on React <> WASM <> Rust but I was able to port all my existing React over into Leptos in a few hours.


Yeah they are great, it's more the poor integration and lack of parallelism that makes it not worthwhile.

Thunking everything through JavaScript and not being able to take advantage of fearless concurrency severely restrict the use-cases. May as well just use TypeScript and React at that point


Yesterday was Pigeons As Hard Drives, today is Peacocks As Lasers.

I look forward to what tomorrow brings.


Combine them with a phalarope to make a fully functioning CD player?


I think I have a story idea for Austin Powers 4



Whenever I explain to someone when or why to use 0-indexing, I like to say:

Start from 0 if you are counting boundaries (fenceposts, memory addresses)

Start from 1 if you are counting spaces (pages in a book, ordinals)

Floors are a case where both make intuitive sense, which is maybe how we ended up with European vs American floor numbering.


That's a very confused way of thinking about it IMO. I say:

* Start from 0 if you are indexing. I.e. you are identifying an item or its position.

* Start from 1 if you are counting. I.e. you are saying how many items there are.

It doesn't matter what it is. I don't know why you think pages in a book are somehow different to memory addresses.


You know what I like this much better...rule of thumb updated.


unit sphere != unit ball

The former is the boundary, the latter is the interior + boundary. One of the great arbitrary naming conventions of math.


Minor nitpick, the ball might be closed or open, depending on whether the boundary is included or not, respectively.


I love the counter-intuition of high-dimensional spaces, seems to be making the rounds on my feeds these days.

One of the harder generalizations to develop intuition for is the fact that the measure of a d-sphere tends to 0 as d approaches infinity, even though for all d = 0, 1, 2, 3 that our meager brains can visualize, the opposite is true! Geometry goes crazy.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: