Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lessname's commentslogin

I really like the server side routing part of Inertia and that you can pass data to the frontend directly in the first request without needing to do an additional http request (altough this might be a bit problematic for sensitive information in case the sites are cached).

However, there are also things that make it feel gimmicky:

- The resolve function createInertiaApp runs more than once (mainly) on the first page load causing a re-render and it seems like there is no plan to fix that in near feature https://github.com/inertiajs/inertia/issues/1595 / https://github.com/inertiajs/inertia/issues/1091

- There are issues like this where they could at least merge the PR to improve the documentation as there seem to be many people to misunderstand the usage the function but it did not happen https://github.com/inertiajs/inertia/issues/1631


Great question. The journalist named in the article (Matt Broomfield) is asking authorities to delist the PKK (which clearly IS a terrorist organization targeting civilians) as a terrorist organization.

https://twitter.com/MattBroomfield1/status/15092064663512760...


That's a stretch to say linked to terrorism, unless the Belgian supreme court is as well.

Source on PKK targeting non-paramilitary/police/military civilians in the last 20 years?

e: I can find this from 1987 (a time when the Turkish state was also actively involved in massacring civilians) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C4%B1narc%C4%B1k_massacre


To name a few:

* December 2016 Istanbul car bombing / suicide bombing near a football stadium, killing 44 people

* October 2016 Istanbul bombing - injuring 10 civilians

* June 2016 Istanbul bombing / killing 6 civilians

* March 2016 Ankara car bombing killing 37 people

* June 2006 Manavgat (in the province Antalya, a popular region for tourists) detonation of a bomb in a tourist site, killing four people

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_2016_Istanbul_bombing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/June_2016_Istanbul_bombing

https://www.dni.gov/nctc/ftos/pkk_fto.html


> * December 2016 Istanbul car bombing / suicide bombing near a football stadium, killing 44 people

TAK != PKK, TAK claimed responsibility. 39 of those killed were police officers. Turkish military also kills civilians while targeting opposing militia groups.

> * June 2014 Istanbul bombing / killing 6 civilians

Link? Did this happen?

> March 2016 Ankara car bombing

TAK not PKK, again.

> * June 2006 Manavgat

Yet again, TAK.

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_2016_Istanbul_bombing

Not intentional targeting civilians, accidental premature explosion of bomb. Only one of the attacks you've mentioned that was by the actual PKK and actually killed civilians. (e: actually no civilians killed)


To his defence, the TAK is often claimed to be a militant wing of the PKK, that handles affairs that might damage the reputation of the main organization. Like how the Provisional IRA formed fake splinter groups to pin sectarian counterattacks on.


I would like to add, Turkeys concerns about the NATO entry of Sweden were not without cause: Sweden has introduced an arms embargo against Turkey, prohibiting arms exports to Turkey. NATO is a military alliance and in case one member gets attacked, others have to support this member. However, one cannot really be sure if that will happen when one country has been initiating arms embargos against another member.


That's a complicated story. Turkey bought the Russian S-400 system instead of NATO weapons, partly because they have economic incentives to be on good foot with Russia, partly because want to be ambivalent enough towards the West to have take advantage of credible threats in upcoming negotiations, partly because of domestic policy reasons.

As was expected, they pretty much immediately found themselves under US weapons embargo. Modern weaponry form integrated systems, and integrating a Russian system in a NATO system is pretty much out of the question for various practical reasons.

The Swedish embargo however was different. Swedish law simply forbids export to countries that use force against civilians. There are plenty of well supported evidence of this taking places, not only in Syria. But all this have to be taken into context to understand the Turkish situation.

Perhaps unfortunately, depending on your perspective, the Swedish embargo was lifted when the NATO negotiations started. That is Realpolitik for you. Nobody wants to risk a Turkey allied with the Eastern block. And Turkey knows perfectly well to take advantage of that. Thus far it seems to be working for Erdogan. The deal maker image gains popularity, which is sorely needed with Turkish economy being what it is. The open question is how far he can push it.



Wasnt it to get US F35s?


How does Caddy compare to Nginx Unit? Is the API easier to use?


You can feed it JSON. I use the Caddyfile, but I found the documentation well done.


Is it really the power of WeChat or the chinese government though?


it's wechat. you really need it in china. it's practically impossible to stay in touch with most people if you don't have it. a phone that can't run wechat is pretty useless.


Actually, it's both. Back in 2022, you have to install either WeChat or Alipay to scan the government's health code literally everywhere.


hmm, i forgot about those. but i wonder if you really needed wechat and if it wasn't possible to scan them with the government provided app that tracks your healthcode too. i think offering wechat support was more out of convenience, and not to push people to use wechat.


The app is obviously incredibly popular, but if it wasn’t back by the Chinese government I imagine apple would have enforced their App Store rules.

I imagine some kind of deal along the lines of “no WeChat no iPhone in China” was done.


seriously, you underestimate the popularity of wechat. no deal is needed because it is easy to see that an iphone without wechat just would not sell!


then they could simply just enable it in China and not in the US


In this scenario it doesn’t really matter. They’re interchangeable.


They are basically the same


They're the same thing


What I really would like to see on youtube is a full text search on video content, at least for videos with subtitles.


Youglish [1] is a website that allow you to search video with timestamp by transcript text

[1] https://youglish.com/


For what it is worth, we work on a tool[0] to index all local videos and images and later allowing query just using natural language. It is based on CLIP which has been trained on image-text pairs, but seems to work great for videos after applying some naive heuristics.

[0] https://github.com/ramanlabs-in/hachi


I stumbled across a ShowHN that did not get to the front page but seems to fit here:

https://clipbase.xyz/


Why? You can find these websites anyway if you search for terms like "buy github stars"


How did you find out the name of the company behind GitHub24 though? If I go to their website I do cannot see it, I even cannot find anything if I search the company name.


I was also surprised when I saw it. A GbR is a German "Gesellschaft bürgerlichen Rechts" which does not need to be formally incorporated and offers no limited liability. The name needs to include the names of all partners, so we can deduce it is being run by two persons. I am quite surprised they do this without liability protection. Upon googling, I found only a playlist on YouTube which has this name and contains one explainer video about signing up a company with German tax authorities. If they are indeed based in Germany, they're required to have an Impressum / imprint on their home-page, without it, they risk being fined.


Perhaps they got it via payment info


If you learn programming you can create a completely unique and useful program. Dropshipping on the other hand is thousands of different people selling the exact same product, there is no value added.


Tbf, from the economical perspective both are a lottery of marketing.


Interesting and scary take.


This is so sad because twitter is still mainly used by people to help each other, e.g. to tell where help is needed or who can help.


With authoritarian regimes, having someone who's not a representative of the regime doing anything to help others is often seen as a threat to the authority of the government.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: