Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lloydatkinson's commentslogin

I wonder why each service doesn’t have a different subdomain.

That's what I do, but you still have to change the default Bitwarden behavior to match on host rather than base domain.

Matching on base domain as the default was surprising to me when I started using Bitwarden... treating subdomains as the same seems dangerous.


It's probably a convenience feature. Tons of sites out there that start on www then bounce you to secure2.bank.com then to auth. and now you're on www2.bank.com and for some inexplicable reason need to type your login again.

Actually it's mostly financial institutions that I've seen this happen with. Have to wonder if they all share the same web auth library that runs on the Z mainframe, or there's some arcane page of the SOC2 guide that mandates a minimum of 3 redirects to confuse the man in the middle.


This is the way. You can even do it with mDNS.

Anthropic feels like they are flailing around constantly trying to find something to do. A C compiler that didn't work, a browser that didn't work, and now solving bugs in Firefox.

This makes sense - they are demonstrating the capability of their core product by doing so? They dont make browsers, c compilers, they sell ai + dev tools.

Capability of a product that makes non-working outputs at a premium?

I can hire an intern for that.


Will cost you a lot more ;)

Seems like a poor advertisement for their product if their shining example of utility is a broken compiler that doesn't function as the README indicates.

Impressive that it made a c compiler though? Or do we judge all programmers by their documentation now?

All it took was all the C compilers they could scrape into their training set.

It’s not impressive in the sense that it’s doing what it was designed to.

It just happens that it generated a C compiler that kind of worked.

Someone came by later and used more AI on it to make it closer to a production grade C compiler like gcc/clang.

Saying, “it made a C compiler,” is not specific enough.


I think it's a nice break from vibe-coding. It feels like a good direction in terms of use cases for LLM.

What was Anthropic's "browser that didn't work"?


Solving bugs in Firefox is quite impressive.

However, the shape is there. And no one knows how good the thing is going to be after X months. We are measuring months here, not even years.

I believe there is a theoretical cap about the capability of LLM. I'm wondering what does it look like.


If it explore all these cases after a few month and made the tool itself obsolete, that sounds like a total win to me?

However that don't happen unless firefox just stop developing though. New code comes with new bug, and there must be some people or some tool to find it out.


I think OpenAI is flailing around too-- we're making an AI-generated shortform video app, we're rescinding restrictions on porn, we're making a... something... with Jony Ive-- but only Anthropic is flailing in a way beneficial to society instead of becoming a trillion dollar heroin dealer.

I can only assume the large downvotes are because Anthropic suck and tried vote manipulation

That's what people back then must have talked about small offshoots like Google and Microsoft back when silicon valley was nascent

No I don’t thanks.

Google will wait for businesses to become very coupled to this and then kill off the CLI just because.

Discord/Reddit moderators living up to their obnoxious stereotype as usual.

I don't know for certain, but moderators (on a company Discord) are likely random people in a 3rd world country that are payed peanuts and that is their only income. If higher ups tell them "I don't want to see the Microslop word anywhere" they just do it.

You should be angry at the higher ups that instead of saying: "maybe they are right and we can do better" they decided to hide the problem through censorship. Which, btw, always has the opposite effect of putting what you are trying to hide in the spotlight.


Spamming "microslop" is obnoxious, filtering out childish behaviour is not obnoxious.

But if you don't want childish behaviour, Discord is an ... interesting choice.


Off topic? By a throwaway account AI slopper no less.

I saw a similar issue on r/PrivatEkonomi (Swedish.) Two doomerism post with subject somewhat adapted to the forum at hand. The two users were young accounts with private comment history.

Someone is definitely on a propaganda tour trying to seed negative sentiment.


I'm glad you said this otherwise someone would call me paranoid. Over on https://lobste.rs/ there is a user currently on their third account called "datarama3" who doom posts exactly like this once a week. It's really tiring.

Sadly I do see this slop taking off purely because something something AI, investors, shareholders, hype. I mean even the Chrome devtools now push AI in my face at least once a week, so the slop has saturated all the layers.

They don't give a fuck about accessibility unless it results in fines. Otherwise it's totally invisible to them. AI on the other hand is everywhere at the moment.


Thanks for sharing my article :)


Of course.


Isn't there a rule about vague titles like this?


They ARE the rule on HN. If you criticize bullshit titles like this, you'll be downvoted and shadow-banned.

Ask me how I know.


Oh I know I’ve experienced it too


To be pedantic that’s the DOM API, which is exposed to JavaScript.

The DOM API has always felt like, and still does, it was written by people that have never made an API.


I don't think that's pedantic. Seems like a valid objection to me.

So many issues in the client JS world originate from insufficient or bad browser APIs.


I don’t really think it’s pedantic it’s just that unless you preface a lot of comments on HN these days, you’ll get a lot of whataboutism and straw man arguments.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: