"This is where the Red Hat acquisition comes in: while IBM will certainly be happy to have the company’s cash-generating RHEL subscription business, the real prize is Openshift, a software suite for building and managing Kubernetes containers."
Small problem with that. Most of the progressive enterprises are trying to move AWAY from containers to fully serverless architectures (Lambda, Google functions, Azure, etc.)
Kubernetes is still hot but the momentum is definitely with Lambda and its ilk.
I'm a consultant who works with enterprises of all sizes (all sizes that could still be considered "enterprise" sized at least) and I've only encountered one that has used anything serverless, and then only in one production application. And I touch basically every IT application/environment across the entire business.
Now I don't want to say my experience is perfectly indicative of what big companies are doing in general, but I certainly haven't noticed this trend. Even containers are just starting to catch on in the enterprise market, and a lot of enterprise software doesn't currently support containerization.
>>Most of the progressive enterprises are trying to move AWAY from containers to fully serverless architectures (Lambda, Google functions, Azure, etc.)
Serverless runs on?
Also Lambda is not a replacement for your webservices. Lambda is very expensive for non-trivial scaling requirements. And yeah bulk of the backends in the industry aren't always web based products.
As a huge proponent of all things ESB related, I can confidently say that ESB is dead.
This is very unfortunate because I think we still need a way to do cross service mediation, process orchestration, etc.
That said, you will not see any new deployments utilizing an ESB. The fact that all open-source ESB projects are essentially abandon ware tells you all you need to know.
Yea, its sad cause you have this cool middleware that can do so many things with the whole EIP theory and all the premade plugins.
What is eating this guys lunch really? and I think there is a void there somewhere thats not nicely filled currently. Some pain points that are exposed because of its demise. Thoughts?
Nearly every company does that. It's amazing how little many companies actually own. I've worked in offices where everything from building over furniture to even the plants was leased. The company ran with close to zero assets (services business). Pretty sure that this wouldn't make any sense if it wasn't for tax purposes.