Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | log_e's comments login

You realize tautology is a logical fallacy, right?


It's like saying "A beginner is new to a subject." That's tautological since the definition of beginner implies being new to a subject.

Those aren't logical fallacies; they're just not very useful.


The first rule of Tautology Club is the first rule of Tautology Club.

https://xkcd.com/703/


Huh? A tautology is a statement that is automatically true by the laws of logic.


GP is correct that the argument contains an informal fallacy[1], and people often express this criticism by saying "your argument is tautological," and you are correct that a tautology is a statement which is always true [2].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_(logic)


> GP is correct that the argument contains an informal fallacy

The GP didn't say that.

As for which informal fallacy the GGP's argument contained, I would say it was more like a false dilemma. And the GGP did say "almost tautological", which implicitly recognizes that there might be other possibilities.

> people often express this criticism by saying "your argument is tautological,"

I have never seen this (nonsensical) way of expressing the criticism that an argument is false by saying that it is tautological (and therefore true).


The point is that it's an overloaded term, which makes it easy to talk past each other.

If you wish to see usages like I described, have a look here.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...


It is not. It is actually quite the opposite.


It's in the standard library. You're a bad programmer if you don't learn the ins and outs of the standard library, or make sweeping generalizations.


Standard library is an API just like any other library. The only thing different about it is backward compatibility (which in JS is paramount and the is reason setTimeout can't be fixed directly). It is a bad design still.


If you want it to happen, ask them for it every day. You are their constituent.


Thank you; I think strongly message preview is a core feature though.

It is a quirk that seemingly, in my opinion, could only hinder discussion.

I'm a mobile-only user due to life circumstances. Having a decent discussion with any formatting to aid communication is especially challenging.

In that respect, is a de-facto accessibility issue as far as facilitating discussion is concerned.

So if it's been proposed but rejected, I wonder what the acceptance criteria is!

*edit: typo *edit: deleted fallacy


This really connected *something for me. Thank you for sharing.

edit: I don't remember tbh


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: