Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lukaslalinsky's commentslogin

I know more about Zig than C++ at this point, but it's hard to read the article seriously, if it starts with such mistakes. Zig does in fact have an HTTP client in the standard library, there is a tar reader, and realpath hasn't been removed, it still exists even in the std.Io namespace.

Edit: Andrew confirmed that the HTTP client and server will stay in the standard library.

Regarding HTTP in Zig, it might be removed in 1.0, if I am reading this correctly. Though Zig std does have both an HTTP client and an HTTP server.

https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/910#issuecomment-39548...


I really wonder in which universe people are living. GitHub Actions was a godsend when it was first released and it still continues to be great. It has just the right amount of abstractions. I've used many CIs in the past and I'd definitely prefer GA over any of them.

Have you used the log viewer? Because I swear the log viewer is the biggest letdown. I love that GitHub Actions is deeply integrated into GitHub. I hate the log viewer, and that's like one of the core parts of it.

Yeah, that's not a good part, I tend to avoid it by downloading the log and looking at it that way. I find it easier and it's just on click.

You get a computer that's compatibles with Linux, you install Ubuntu LTS, and you just keep using it. After a couple of years, you reinstall it. If you are a power user able to prepare the boot USB and boot from it, you do it yourself, otherwise you have to pay someone to do it for it for you or buy a computer with Ubuntu preinstalled. I've been using Ubuntu for more than 20 years, Debian before that, and Linux is definitely not my hobby.


Maybe Windows should remain as a professional tool for using these applications. Most people don't need them. They need a web browser and not much else. Maybe some games for kids. Something like Ubuntu can serve those needs just fine. If you need VS for developing Windows apps, then you obviously stay on Windows.


“ They need a web browser and not much else.”

These people will probably use a tablet or phone.


Yes, but if they need to write a document, the larger screen and keyboard make it more usable.


Then they will attach a keyboard to their tablet. I think desktop OS for personal use is pretty much on the way out.


Does your mother know how to install a device driver on Windows? None of the non-technical people I know can't fix anything on their computers.

I've been doing experiments over the last 10 or so years, I've been borrowing my Linux laptops to people, and to my surprise, they had absolutely no problem using it. Especially children, you just start using GNOME as if it's nothing. They are already used to different phones, different kinds of computers, it really makes no difference to them. Your mother is probably checking gmail, watching youtube, and maybe writing google docs, not much else.


> Your mother is probably checking gmail, watching youtube, and maybe writing google docs, not much else.

Condescending.

My mother shouldn't need to mess with udev rules to play music to her Bluetooth Speaker because she uses a Bluetooth mouse and keyboard.

She also doesn't want to hang about waiting for systemd to shutdown X out of Y retries when she turns off the desktop because the bluetooth speaker had gone awol.

She also uses a wacom tablet which requires more configuration. Windows provides Plug & Play, and then works. Linux provides Plug & Play with lumps requiring configuration outside of a USB stick.

Can we stop pretending that linux is perfect and in a state for non-techies to swap over? It's potential but still not suitable for the average user. Watching streaming services natively isn't possible without some sort of a hack.

I do it for a job, I don't want to be further support for her outside of. She's an 70-year old illustrator so Photoshop is a must. Her friends who are in their 50's are the same. Linux even after retraining wouldn't gel with them.

Krita, GIMP, are not alternatives for her. Heck, she even maintains her own website.

My father is a historian. He has archives of history stuff bottled away on applications that are not *nix. Yes Wine is suitable for that but that again another set of obstacles.


I was super interested in the non-assembly coroutine approach, as I'm working on a similar project for Zig, but it turns out it just embeds x86_64 binary. Why is that better than having assembly there?


I think the split between vibe coding and AI-assisted coding will only widen over time. If you ask LLMs to do something complex, they will fail and you waste your time. If you work with them as a peer, and you delegate tasks to them, they will succeed and you save your time.


I work with leers by delegating complex task to them while I do other complex tasks.


Speaking of asynchronous agents, what do people use? Claude Code for web is extremely limited, because you have no custom tools. Claude Code in GitHub Actions is vastly more useful, due to the custom environment, but ackward to use interactively. Are there any good alternatives?


I use Claude Code for web with an environment allowing full internet access, which means it can install extra tools as and when it needs them. I don't run into limits with it very often.


I just use a couple of custom MCP tools with the standard claude desktop app:

https://chrisfrew.in/blog/two-of-my-favorite-mcp-tools-i-use...

IMO this is the best balance of getting agentic work done while having immediate access to anything else you may need with your development process.


What exactly do you mean by custom tools here? Just cli tools accessible to the agent?


Development environment needed to build and test the project.


I'm running Claude Code in a tmux on a VPS, and I'm working on setting up a meta-agent who can talk to me over text messages


Hey - this sounds like really interesting set-up!

Would you be open to providing more details. Would love to hear more, your workflows, etc.


Pretty sure next year's wrapup will have "Year of the sub-agent"


Isn't WASM more suitable for game scripting? It's the first time I read about using emulation of a real CPU architecture as a scripting solution.


Linux API/ABI doesn't cover the entire spectrum that Windows API covers. There is everything from lowest level kernel stuff to the desktop environment and beyond. In Linux deployments, that's achieved by a mix of different libraries from different developers and these change over time.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: