I totally agree. I’ve always liked Castro’s inbox/quick action method of dealing with new episodes a lot better than other apps. I’m glad it’s back and am glad to subscribe again.

FYI this changed a couple weeks ago. They reopened signups in mid-December.

Someone on Reddit was able to match this to India’s PSLV third stage rocket: https://www.reddit.com/r/whatisthisthing/comments/1513w1i/ap...

The “k” means “thousands”, meaning they raised $670,000 and not $670 million.

I genuinely read that thing about the K as being a reference to the K in Kagi.

I'm going to go have a coffee.

We all have moments like that :)

> I also think it'd be great to live near people who are having children at the same time as I am having children.

This came automatically for us as our kids got old enough to go to school. You naturally meet lots of parents in your community with kids the same ages as yours, through school activities and extracurriculars.

That sounds a lot like Regus to me, which has been around for a long time: https://www.regus.com/en-us

I’d rather die than spend five minutes in a Regus.

I'm a constant user of `fzf` and autojump (`j`) so combined them into this shell alias I use regularly:

  alias jf="cd \$(sort -nr ~/Library/autojump/autojump.txt | awk 'BEGIN {FS = \"\\t\"} {print \$2}' | fzf)"

or without the escaping:

  cd $(sort -nr ~/Library/autojump/autojump.txt | awk 'BEGIN {FS = "\t"} {print $2}' | fzf)

It gets my autojump history, sorts it by most used on top, extracts just the directory names, pipes the list to `fzf` and `cd`s into the selection. It's great because my most-used directories will be right on top of the `fzf` list.

It's using Craft CMS as the CMS, though that doesn't imply a specific set of front-end technologies or build processes (Craft can use the Twig templating language, or be headless and power a static site generator).

I think the above commenter was referring to the original parking fee paid, and getting that back from the government - not getting anything back from OpenAI.

Maybe, but then still no? They purchased the right to park a specific vehicle, which they identified with a description that did not match the actual vehicle they chose to park. They received, but did not use, exactly what they paid for.

I don't think judges like shitty gotchas like that.

I am far from an expert in Australian law, but I don’t think you can usually take a local council to court, though I think there is a state level Ombudsman you can seek review from of some or all decisions. But, I think you'd be gerring review of the decision on the fine for the violation, not a refund of the parking fee in that case (and, if you could sue, that would be true there, too.)

Chief Operating Officer