Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more maxcan's commentslogin

"No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame."

- https://slashdot.org/story/01/10/23/1816257/apple-releases-i...


I don't like Twitter's emoji. I prefer Apple's implementation. I spent about 5 minutes on this, thank you Claude.

This isn't pretty at all, I know. It's not meant to showcase any kind of personal talents. Just an itch I finally scratched.


Completely agree.

The Expanse novels & series and Hail Mary have ruined me for fantasy-science-fiction. I love the idea of having one big conceit and then building a universe that is as consistent as possible with everything from known physics to known sociology and psychology given that conceit.

For the expanse it was fusion drives and the protomolecule. For Hail Mary it was astrophage.

Just like the magical linguistic tools of Hail Mary, the Expanse broke this a bit too with things like spinning up the asteroids without ripping them apart. But, these are still two of the best hard science fiction out there. Sorry Cixin, Remembrance of Earth's Past was fantastic but it quickly devolved into fantasy.

One note, I always thought the spinning up asteroids part of The Expanse was particularly unfortunate because the plot would have worked just as well with giant spinning stations on the asteroid surfaces to let the belters live in limited gravity.


Near Miss. Fond memories.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/175470605636


Exactly. The mostly likely outcome is providers just pulling out of poorer neighborhoods or even the whole city (if forced).


Compare and contrast to Aeroflot 1492:

Aeroflot: 41 passenger deaths, many bags saved.

JAL: 0 passenger deaths, 0 bags saved.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_DT8dDIugQ


How do you know that nobody evacuated with a bag?


Came here to say this. He is excellent. Also, the Opposing Bases podcast is wonderful.


*She


Agreed, but here is a great explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_k1TQGK3mZI


Deterrence clearly would be served from drivers predictably knowing that causing pedestrian fatalities would lead to jail time.


Really? You think that people are fine with killing pedestrians, but if only they might go to jail they wouldn't do that?


I think drivers are fine with causing a certain amount of risk to pedestrians. Strong, predictable penalties would lower the typical risk level drivers were willing to subject pedestrians to.

It’s not binary, it’s a distribution and I do believe you can alter that distribution.


Yes, that's how I know I was roughly the 600,000th person to sign up for thefacebook.com.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: