That is honestly the only explanation I can find. I mean what other explanation is out there? I am beginning to suspect that 5 years from now we´ll have a snowden like leak that will showcase that this is probably the case. I hope that I´m wrong but I seriously doubt that this isn´t the case at this point.
That's pure conjecture. Or Milo canceled the account as a publicity stunt. The image he posted was completely out of context and with no explanation. We don't know and I seriously doubt anyone cares about Milo that much.
>Which would be made publicly known by Coinbase within hours.
Why would they? They're not required to and I don't know of any business that has a policy to publicly reveal why an account was closed. Considering Milo's history there's a more than likely chance it has something to do with his financial and legal issues if he was even banned to being with. Again he just posted a screenshot without reference.
> The issue here is not about a single individual.
If you mean Alex Jones, Laura Loomer and Louisa Farrakhan then I think I found the problem.
Why would you assume there's an explicit blacklist? I'd think it's just that people independently note who gets a lot of bad press.
Some people are just potentially a liability to provide service for because of the risk of mass activist backlash and terrible PR if someone decides you're supporting them and it gets traction online.
1. Twitter is an information content provider. Twitter creates and develops content, in whole or in part, through a combination of means: (a) by explicit censorship of viewpoints with which it disagrees, (b) by shadow-banning conservatives, such as Plaintiff, (c) by knowingly hosting and monetizing content that is clearly abusive, hateful and defamatory – providing both a voice and financial incentive to the defamers – thereby facilitating defamation on its platform, (d) by completely ignoring lawful complaints about offensive content and by allowing that content to remain accessible to the public, and (e) by intentionally abandoning and refusing to enforce its so-called Terms of Service and Twitter Rules – essentially refusing to self-regulate – thereby selectively amplifying the message of defamers such as Mair, Devin Nunes’ Mom and Devin Nunes’ cow, and materially contributing to the libelousness of the hundreds of posts at issue in this action.
2. Twitter created and developed the content at issue in this case by transforming false accusations of criminal conduct, imputed wrongdoing, dishonesty and lack of integrity into a publicly available commodity used by unscrupulous political operatives and their donor/clients as a weapon. Twitter knew the defamation was (and is) happening. Twitter let it happen because Twitter had (and has) a political agenda and motive: Twitter allowed (and allows) its platform to serve as a portal of defamation in order to undermine public confidence in Plaintiff and to benefit his opponents and opponents of the Republican Party. In this case, Twitter contributed materially to the illegal conduct of defamers Mair, Devin Nunes’ Mom and Devin Nunes’ cow. Twitter, by its actions, intended to generate and proliferate the false and defamatory statements about Plaintiff in order to influence the outcome of the 2018 Congressional election and to intimidate Plaintiff and interfere with his important investigation of corruption by the Clinton campaign and alleged Russian involvement in the 2016 Presidential Election. Twitter knowingly acted as a vessel of opposition research."
Perhaps the issue hinges on how one defines "co-founder" and what was or what became Greenpeace. It could be that both parties are correct in their interpretation.
> A software update intended to fix the problem identified in the Lion Air crash still hasn’t been rolled out. The fact that the crew on Flight 610 are likely to have been aware of the known issues with the aircraft, too, raises the more worrying possibility that there’s an unknown complication.
> The relocated engines and their refined nacelle shape caused an upward pitching moment -- in essence, the Max's nose was getting nudged skyward... putting the aircraft at risk of stalling, according to a series of questions and answers provided to pilots at Southwest Airlines. The Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System(MCAS) was designed to address this.
"Unfortunately, Apple's butterfly-switch keyboards have a troubled history of failure — littered with users shooting compressed air at stuck, unresponsive keys. There have even been a couple of class-action lawsuits.
...
Apple's been decidedly mum on the reliability of its 2018 MacBook keyboards. From what we've seen, though, Apple is trying to fix the situation: leaked documents explain how the 3rd-gen keys have a membrane layer (the existence of which was confirmed in an iFixit teardown) under the keys would protect the switches from debris. But flaws, apparently, still linger."
All Rust programs call out to platform-dependent unsafe code sooner or later in the form of the standard library. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to allocate memory or do any I/O whatsoever.
Sometimes the standard library doesn't expose functionality you want, like the capability to read/write the ECN bits of your UDP packets, so you have to bind some syscalls yourself. The capability to do this is one of Rust's core strengths, and it does not compromise a program's rustiness any moreso than calling a wrapper around write to print "Hello, world!" does.
Any systems language has to deal with unsafe code at some level, the big difference to C is that is explicit and not present at every statement that has to deal with memory access.
Knowing whether something just links in a C library and adds a wrapper, and how thick that wrapper around it is useful in knowing how ergonomic the API will be, and how easy it is to cross target.
For example, if you want to run on musl with a statically linked libc, then a library which is just a wrapper around a C shared library which depends on glibc is a non starter.
Our team created email addresses with different email providers and signed up for the email lists of around fifty different candidates, committees, and political nonprofits. In the month leading up to the election, we tracked how many emails were sent from each entity, and what percentage of those emails made it into our inbox.
In Nevada, Democrat Jacky Rosen averaged over 90% placement in inboxes, compared to Dean Heller’s over 90% placement in spam.
In Florida, 100% of Republican Rick Scott’s emails went to spam in Yahoo, while 100% of Bill Nelson’s emails went to our Yahoo inbox.
While these were the most dramatic examples, this pattern emerged in every toss-up Senate race we tracked.
I'm completely unsurprised that Heller emails ended up in SPAM at a high rate. I was bombarded with email from his campaign and various PACs supporting him. All of the emails were sent to an email address that was used to donate to an unrelated Republican candidate in 2008. There's a whole lot of really obvious list sharing going on.
> The 9 percent tax will hit PlayStation services on November 14 ... PlayStation isn't the only digital service affected by Chicago's Amusement Tax. Spotify, Netflix, and Xbox are all subjected to the same taxes enacted under mayor Rahm Emanuel and has seen Netflix raise subscription prices in Chicago. ... The tax isn't popular in the city of Chicago, but Emanuel says the taxes are necessary to shore up the city's pensions. Several companies like Apple and Netflix are taking action against the city for the taxes, but until any changes are made PlayStation gamers are now subject to the same tax as other amusement activities.
> Such a chama was Satoshi Nakamoto. It’s apparent from what is now publicly known that the famous team worked in both excessive secrecy but very high trust. This handful of professionals from the Internet security field contributed jointly and separately to code, keys, design, vision, business, documentation, communications and opsec. As a common enterprise with a shared goal, enveloped in a dangerous environment, the Satoshi Nakamotii, various, faced more or less the same challenges that the members of any chama would face in Kibera: work in secret, protect the assets or be robbed and destroyed. Stay close to the vision, stay the long path, and in perhaps the ultimate irony, don’t allow personalities to be swayed by success.
> You don’t have to believe me that Satoshi Nakamoto was a chama — and the surviving members may also be bemused and disagreeable. I care little for their bemusement or your disbelief, as being bemused and disagreeable is just evidence of a twitter handle or a reddit post and most people out there are incapable of dealing with that simple scientific logic: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
For reference, the same author posted in May 2016:
"SATOSHI IS DEAD - LONG LIVE SATOSHI - TEAM LEADER COMES OUT"
The city government here is terrible. We’ve gone well past the point of of tolerance here. There are tons of violent, aggressive, tweakers and thieves the city does nothing about. I feel for the mentally ill and they deserve help. But there are even more that are just crackheads and tweakers who just don’t want to live in society and prefer living on the street. We have got to start enforcing the law and driving those criminal types out of the city or put them in jail. I can’t even go to the Safeway down the street without feeling unsafe. I have to walk my wife to her car every day because there have been so many creeps and weirdos in our garage.... cops refuse to do jackshit about trespassing. Why is such a shithole so expensive? Can’t we pay a little more and just solve this problem? The status quo cannot be allowed to continue.
I don’t think Breed is okay with this display of overbearing government. This outlsndish and hope it wakes people up to the misalignment between govt and the needs of the population at large.
Breed comes from the moderate wing, like most of SF's real leadership.
Aaron Peskin and his allies like Safai and Kim... I don't know what to call them. They style themselves progressive but really all they do is pander to various constituencies across the spectrum of SF politics. Their policies are inconsistent and altogether ridiculous. They're a reflection of our absurd national politics--reactionary, pseudo-intellectual, anything but pragmatic and results oriented.
I think you're right. I hope the citizenry prove her right and re-elect her in 18 months. But I can already Imagine Peskin and Kim conspiring against her. Those two are not there to serve "the people" they only serve very narrow interests and derail the city from consistent policies to better it for everyone.
Maybe the city should directly address those things instead of hoping that a bought-out law crafted for special interests will magically fix it for them.
At the risk of nit-picking the humor out of your comment, I'd say the city's politicians already do run that gauntlet. City Hall is adjacent to the open-air drug market known as the Tenderloin, and many members of the city's transient population frequent the park in front of City Hall. Also, the closest BART stop (Civic Center station) is arguably the stop in SF with the most persistent hygiene issues.
