If I had to guess, antirez was describing engineering managers and tech leads that have (mis)read “clean code” or similar works, and take them as commandments from on high rather than tools and approaches that may be helpful or applicable in some circumstances.
Or, more generally, the fact that most of what the software industry produces is much more in line with “art” than “engineering” (especially when looked at from a Mechanical Engineer or Civil Engineer). We have so much implementation flexibility to achieve very similar results that it can be dizzying from the standpoint of other engineering fields. consider
If you just talk about notifications, the apple watch is better, in that you can reply without pulling out your phone, or even take the voice call, which you can't (at least afaik) on a Garmin.
If you look at Apple watch activity tracking, though, Garmin is playing a different ballgame.
Calorie counting on apple is off by 2-5x (compared to energy output measured on an erg, and running and biking are similarly _really_ incorrect on apple, and in my experience pretty spot-on with Garmin).
Reviewing an activity on apple fitness is really, _really_ coarse. You can't pick what metric is shown on the map. You can't plot a metric over time. Even something as simple as max speed? Who knows!
Apple's attempted copycat of body battery functionality in the new iOS 18 seems like it was designed by a PM that was handed 2-3 screenshots from a Garmin, shrugged, and went from that. It's wholly useless—but on Garmin, this is a valuable feature included 8 years ago in their cheapest running watches.
Some Garmin devices have a speaker and microphone so you can take a voice call using it as a Bluetooth device linked to your phone.
You can also reply to text messages with a limited set of canned responses on Android phones only. This doesn't work on iPhones because Apple has intentionally blocked third-party smart watches from being allowed to use that API in a particularly monopolistic and consumer-hostile move.
I've recently used two different vendors, replied within minutes to each of their queries in hopes of expediting the process, but each time it took the better part of 2 months before I was in possession of a USB signing key.
This is for a Delaware C-corp, so it was about as vanilla as it could be for their side.
It used to be Digicert, but they hit the rock bottom and went straight below it after their merge with Symantec. Quadrupled their prices by forcing everyone on subscriptions, obnoxious sales people, sales phone calls, price negotiations, the whole shebang. However, their validation team is still the best.
It took some searching, but it turns out that they spun off their non-subscription certificate business under the name of GoGetSSL. This entity resells other vendors too, but if you get their "own" certificate, which is the cheapest of the bunch, the validation is done by Digicert. So, that's the answer for the time being.
Entrust, Globalsign, Certum are way more expensive, slow and bureaucratic. Comodo (or Sectigo, which is the same thing) are just utter crap. Their validation process is an India-outsourced torture. Never again. Not even for free.
(Both Claude and ChatGPT are excellent at cooking up ffmpeg scripts, but sometimes you need to ask both, or reword the prompt a bit to get something that works)
It can be, but the idea of having “code experts” (or people with the most battle scars with this chunk of code) can absolutely be helpful, especially if the team is sufficiently large (and people aren’t afraid to talk to other people for guidance).
I couldn’t upgrade PhotoStructure to v5.0.0 due to a showstopping error thrown deep in the new router (for a valid path spec). I haven’t tried the new patch release yet (nor even had time to properly trace where the issue in express was to file a reasonable issue).
I suspect the motion lag from “inside-out” tracking (compared to valve index or vive, which was tolerable) was enough to induce nausea, at least for me.
Or, more generally, the fact that most of what the software industry produces is much more in line with “art” than “engineering” (especially when looked at from a Mechanical Engineer or Civil Engineer). We have so much implementation flexibility to achieve very similar results that it can be dizzying from the standpoint of other engineering fields. consider
reply