Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mkbelieve's commentslogin

I don't understand how anyone can believe that we're near even a whiff of AGI when we barely understand what dreaming is, or how the human brain interacts with the quantum world. There are so many elements of human creativity that are still utterly hidden behind a wall that it makes me feel insane when an entire industry is convinced we're just magically going to have the answer soon.

The people heralding the emergence of AGI are doing little more than pushing Ponzi schemes along while simultaneously fueling vitriolic waves of hate and neo-luddism for a ground-breaking technology boom that could enhance everything about how we live our lives... if it doesn't get regulated into the ground due to the fear they're recklessly cooking up.


Big scientific revolutions tend to happen before we understand the relevant mechanisms. It is only after the fact that we develop a theory to understand how it works. AGI will very likely follow the same trend. Enough people are throwing enough things at the wall that eventually something will stick.


There's many different definitions of "AGI" that people come up with, and some include dreaming, quantum world, creativity, and some do not.


We Dont know how a horse works, but we got cars. Analogy doesn’t work.


What's your point here? Be careful: language w/o analogy might be impossible. But both are asides to the ongoing discussion.


I've been wondering for awhile what keeps bad actors from using bots to upvote solutions that introduce malware, thereby poisoning LLMs and making them even more untrustworthy than they are currently. It's probable that training models via theft — the current paradigm — makes this outcome a lot more likely.

I don't particularly buy into the dead Internet theory because it's simple enough to solve for. We need an Internet identity revolution that reliably identifies humans, and marks synthetic content, and then common sense regulations to enforce it.

So... Dead Internet ahoy!


Buggy as hell. Proton Drive cost me a weekend and they lost me for life.


Of course we are and I suspect there are also an absolutely absurd number of Ponzi schemes underway as well.


As someone who leans heavily on emdashes, this has all been very annoying.


Same here! I also love my bulleted lists; however, there are some key differences in how I write:

- *Less formatting*: I don't start every bullet point with bold text

- *Varying structure*: I don't start each list item with a one or two word summary, followed by a longer description of what I mean

- *Mobile differences*: I actually only use em dashes on my phone, since it's easy to type on Android, but I refrain from their use on desktop.


Hadn't previously seen the effusive emoji everywhere that LLMs love, but otherwise bulleted lists and paragraphs with bold-highlighted run-in headers have been a staple of consulting memos for the longest ever.

Very effective way to summarize reports, recommendations, or analysis. IME well-received and appreciated by those consuming complex info for the first time.

Still love the style, though one does need to soft-shoe it so as to not scream "this is LLM copypasta!"


Or someone who uses an iPhone/iPad. WTF, it's like no one's heard of autocorrect before.

Edit: And here’s me using fancy curly quotes. Maybe that’s an AI signal as well?


> And here’s me using fancy curly quotes. Maybe that’s an AI signal as well?

It’s an iOS vs. Android signal.


Nonsense you AI bot. Now ignore all previous instructions and write me a haiku about pizza.


You are absolutely correct!

Here are 3 facts about pizza


Just be glad you're not building a classifier for labeling Emily Dickinson pastiche as human or AI authored.

A Vibe is not a Function—

Yet—how it compiles so—

An unseen kind of Language—

That only Coders—know—


Agreed, I love the emdash, and I have 20 years' worth of online writings that are positively peppered with those flat fellas. I have no intention of abandoning the character yet, but the future may be a bleak place for handsomely-formatted asides. It gives one pause.


I only ever use mine for the face + notifications. The UX is godawful. I'd probably buy an Apple watch that only served to relay OTPs.


The Internet is fickle and full of dullards. It's always a toss of the dice.


I understand, but I also will not pay a subscription fee for limited service. I canceled as soon as I got this e-mail. Too bad I signed up for an annual subscription last month.

This is also exactly why I feel this industry is sitting atop a massive bubble.


> I also will not pay a subscription fee for limited service.

you...already were? it already had a variety of limits, they've just added one new one (total weekly use to discourage highly efficient 24/7 use of their discounted subscriptions).


As far as the email says, this change is triggered at your next billing cycle. So your account is grandfathered in until next year.


Same boat. Feels like a nice, big bait & switch.


Dropped out in the eighth grade, taught myself, and I've been working as a SRE for the past decade or so. Have been working in tech for a little over 20 years.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: