"Subject to the exceptions" conflicts with the "no exceptions" wording in the GPL licenses, so I don't even see how any of this constitutes a valid license

AGPL does not say "no exceptions". AGPL explicity allows exceptions:

https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost/blob/master/LICENSE...

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html

I read the exceptions as a grant of additional rights to mattermost's copyright (but not to third parties), I don't think that conflicts.

I'm not sure that they actually granted a GPL license at all though. I could see this document being read as an advertisement that one might be for sale instead of a grant...

(Not a lawyer)

7182294905658010 "rosey maple moth" 6344346315172974 "rose maple moth"

Valentine's is in mid February

The sunset date is the 13th. V-day is on the 14th.

There was a bug, since fixed, that erroneously capped at something like 60% of the limit, if you want to try again

You mean the harness bug on 26th? I'm aware. Just that the limit I mentioned happened since early January.

wouldn't the harness bug only affect claude code? I usually track my quota status via the web app and saw a similar effect as the GP

You got "four thou-sand se-ven hun-dred six-ty-five" :)

Nope, I got "four seven six five", which is exactly how I would read that number if it were a street address, or a phone extension, or an inumber, or the like. You will notice that the site doesn't give any context about the usage of these numbers.

I'm not aware of anything for electric _cars_ other than aftermarket ECUs and smaller patches, version up/downgrades or cross-market reflashing, but together with a few other people I've built https://librescoot.org/ as an open source replacement firmware for electric scooters (mopeds, not standing scooters). The actual ECU firmware has also been reverse engineered, but for legal reasons has been deprioritized - if anyone here is well-versed in STM32 reverse engineering and feels like taking on e-scooter ECUs, let me know :)

*she

I believe perhaps is a seven letter word, not six? Or was it just compressed? ^^

And now they rewrote Git history and that commit is dangling. Wow...

There is nothing normal about this, as you can easily verify by looking at recorded weather history.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. I’ve had these temperatures in summer as a child in the same location I am now.

Oh yes 2003, how about a 2003 every year?

I'd expect a bit more statistical knowledge here...

In my country we’re experiencing the first heatwave in more than 3 years..

Used to be every 2 years in my childhood.

Both the duration and average and maximum temperature are all lower now compared to my childhood.

Is that enough statistics for extreme temperatures not being that extreme compared to previously? At least in my country?

How do you define "the same people"? Everyone who publishes weather data?

What agenda do you think people have that are long dead?

If you distrust everything you can measure it yourself. I am still in youth and even I can see changes myself. There used to be snow in the winter and now it's rare for example. Yes that is weather not climate; I don't live long enough to see climate changes. But there are oil paintings from 300 years ago. Are these fake?

Genuine question: How do you know, that people who know climate change is made-up are trustworthy and don't have their own agenda?

I have no idea if they have their own agenda, but their ends (such as supporting private transportation and meat consumption) I support. Even if I didn’t trust them, and I don’t trust them either, the ends justify the means.

My God the radicalisation funnel produces some utter brain rot. Unsubstantiated accusations, slippery positions designed to distance your moral culpability in the consequences of your actions. Seriously, read yourself sometime.

The radicalisation of… check notes… being able of affording meat and a car.

> check notes

Please avoid snarky tropes like this on HN.

Do you despise public transport as a concept or just the current subpar implementation?

I think climate research is orthogonal to any political agenda, i.e. opposing private transportation and meat consumption doesn't follow from accepting that the climate is getting warmer and the validity of political agendas has no effect on the authenticity of climate research data.

So do you reject the theory that weather is getting warmer on average on its one or only when it is combined with a specific political agenda?

Weather analysts?

What "draconian measures"? Planting trees and installing water fountains?

You know those draconian trees. That would be some very severe foliage.