The information about ""Pricing", "Privacy Policy", and "Terms of Service" is missing and the links in the footer to this information are broken.

Evidence that this is an AI-generated “product” to catch unsuspecting people.

Caution: Running random scripts from the internet against your 1Password database/backup can pose serious security risks. While a script may seem safe now, future modifications could introduce vulnerabilities. Comments and documentation may become outdated, leaving your data vulnerable. Exercise extreme caution and thoroughly review any script before execution. Your data security is paramount.

This is vaguely offensive. I think perhaps you didn't actually look at my project, which includes this warning every time you run it.

Additionally, it's open source, so you can check.

I really like the option to deploy through a git push without additional setup, and I am looking for something similar to host a bunch of containers. Does anyone here have experience with such a tool, and what is your experience regarding reliability?

You might want to check out dokku

You might want to be careful with this though because if your application is built on the same server where your productive apps consuming some of the memory it could affect performance of your deployment or even take it down.

Dokku allows for deploying apps from images built in CI - which is quite effective if you also test your image artifacts in CI and don't want to build twice.

If you are using our Nomad or Kubernetes plugins, you can also run the apps on servers other than the one you are building on.

Yup I am aware :) I am just warning them of jumping in without reading too much of the documentation.

I wasn't satisfied with any of the solutions, so I wrote Harbormaster:

https://pypi.org/project/docker-harbormaster

It's great if you want to run generic utilities at home (though I've used it at work in internal production and it was good), but it doesn't do ingress, so you have to bring your own.

It's basically a fancy/opinionated wrapper over "git pull && docker-compose up", with allowing you to specify all configuration in one file/repo.

A 2nd for Dokku. It's dead simple and works on any host. Yes, it is limited to single server architecture, but for most people this shouldn't be a problem. Vertical scaling can go a long way.

Maintainer of Dokku here.

Dokku does support both Kubernetes and Nomad as deployment targets, so it's not strictly single-server (though app builds currently are).

CapRover is a nice alternative to dokku/ledokku

Have you looked into Google Cloud Run?

Yarn is a PaaS that deploys through a git push, without additional setup deployment is done from a hosted site with additional setup . . .

I really liked the option to deploy through a git push without additional setup. But it indeed looks like abandonware, thanks for sharing your experience! If you would start over, would you choose for Portainer and Swarm again? Do you know of any alternatives to Swarmlet?

Portainer can poll your git repo and supports webhooks. I went with portainer early on and haven't looked back.

Thats really good advice, was also still using the BX10 Storage Box. Upgraded now :)

Thanks!

Wow, that commenting system is so nice. I was looking for something like that! Amazing :)

Edit: it sees https://utteranc.es/ is used.

Hey mono-bob :), it really is cool, I only added it last night. I used to use utteranc.es, but now I use https://giscus.app. It's like utterances, but allows comment threads and reactions to the page (likes/emojis).

Correct link: https://utteranc.es/

Have you seen http://cactus.chat?

Nice! Thanks for the tip

Aaaand rate limited.

With the whole privacy debate of linking external assets and thus making the up addresses of your visitors visible, I can imagine that using Font Awesome is also problematic because they count page views for their pricing model.

This is exactly the kind of engineering this world needs during a global semiconductor shortage...

Not even that. Apple recieves a visual derivative of the image, such as a low-resolution version, for manual review.

The downside it that this makes the human review process tricky. Because there is, understandably, no actual CSAM image to compare the visual derivative with. Images that look similar enough (contain nudity or a child in a swimsuit) may get past the human review process.

Apple recieves a visual derivative of the image, such as a low-resolution version, for manual review. This makes the human review process tricky. Because there is, understandably, no actual CSAM image to compare the visual derivative with, images that look similar enough (contain nudity or a child in a swimsuit) may get past the human review process.

So your concern is that someone is unlucky enough to a) suffer 30+ neural hash collisions, b) some subset of those are indistinguishable from child pornography due to low resolution (flesh colored bathing suits), c) those images match the multi stage hash, then d) authorities subpoena the full resolution images, which turn out to be innocuous but they decide to harass the user anyway.

I dunno man, I’m not to worried about this chain of events.