I don't see a link to that in this article? The previous article linked all three - I've updated (but the first was prioritised in the body of that post)
In this Times piece, a study author, interviewed by NPR, was part of the paper: Reviving-like prosocial behavior in response to unconscious or dead conspecifics in rodentshttps://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adq2677
It's strange all three papers have different authors from different edus (colorado.edu, ecla.edu, NIH, esc.edu)
first, folks need to exit/reduce their positions stealthily without disrupting the market. this takes time; for big positions it is not unusual to be exiting it for more than 6 months
The new OS that doesn’t exist yet. Linux is starting to show its age, dominated by special interest groups and with the upcoming C+Rust contention it’s a perfect breeding ground for the competitor to enter the scene. Best idea likely not to come from corporate
Multiple possibilities exist but everything depends on context and the skill set.
One option is to start a consulting business with a group of engineers (essentially a market equivalent of a union but with more legal protections) and start charging very high market rates and nickel-and-dime the client hedge fund style with pass-through fees for everything. Use the knowledge of former jobs’ contracts and undercut on price.
If the skill set is very niche and highly specialized you could even attempt cornering the market by recruiting people away that are still employed and sell back their services through the consulting gig (offer profit share as a sweetener, etc.)
None of his corporations is a media one, and his social media company probably has some vague interest in not having too much enforcement of copyright.
Actually this is something that has always perplexed me about corporations that want to meddle in our government. Obviously they must know that it is going to involve the government following the interest of… some corporation. The voters are pretty fickle and having the government work for your competition seems like a pretty rough spot.
I guess it is like a prisoner’s dilemma type thing or something.
It’s mostly because most Americans have very little clue of what the end state and the process to get there looks like. A lot of commonalities like borderline legal or gray area business practices are often extolled as virtues here or “clever business hacks”. It takes only a few to apply them in the direction that a lot of folks are simply unfamiliar with without having lived in the Soviet bloc.
We have a 28 year blueprint of how bad it can get and it starts in 1997 Russia
One thing people don’t anticipate is that the government can step in and nationalize enterprises. US hasn’t done that in a while but I’d be watching for hostile political takeovers at some point in the future. Last time it happened was with General Motors in 2008 but it’s a tool that exists and can be used in a different direction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_companies_in_E...