Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mrwd021's commentslogin

lol!


how do you do that?


well done. bravo


:p


really? what do they use Cassandra for?


Back in 2014 when i last used Cassandra, Netflix were using it for some kind of metrics store i believe. They also published the nicer-to-use client back then (astyanx or something it was called - nicer API than Hector).

My memory is letting me down here on specifics - in my defence it's been a long time since i answered questions on stack overflow about Cassandra. I absolutely loved working with the product even if the sharp edges cut me a few times (ultimately my own fault not Cassandra's).


Netflix uses it for everything that you'd use Postgres for but:

- they have Cassandra committers (most end up going to Apple iCloud)

- they have mgmt. support to make it work

- they are/were on tokens for years, not vtokens, since their internal tools were token-based

(They started with Oracle Enterprise (and a little MySQL), tried Mongo briefly, then decided to make Cassandra work for them.)

Source: original Netflix Cassandra team member.


why wouldnt they


Because it's not at all core to their general proposition of providing business intelligence, mobile software, and cloud-based services?

They are a services company, not a speculative investment fund.


Your balance sheet is either cash, which can evaporate overnight due to rampant inflation which many economists are predicting, or you can convert some or all of that to BTC. As a company, you need to manage your cash. Companies invest their balance sheet in debt, money markets, etc. That doesn’t imply that you are somehow a fund. You have no choice but to manage your cash. I recommend just reading Michael Saylor’s posts or listen to this podcast which provides a good summary of their thinking: https://open.spotify.com/episode/1VwUjvMNeoOeyiQwP3im6G?si=z...


Bitcoin has had a 50% drop two times in the last three years. No matter how bullish you are on its long-term prospects, it can't possibly be seen as a stable store of value in the short term.


At this point they are effectively staked their entire success to BTC. They aren’t just putting cash into BTC they are taking on additional debt to buy BTC.

If you had a strong core business anyway you wouldn’t do this, it’s just a sign that their core business is failing and that pivoting to a Bitcoin investment company is a Hail Mary.


The question is why a company doing < $500mm in annual revenue is holding $4B in cash. That's really the only question. It doesn't matter whether it's crypto or real estate or USD. The question is why it's holding so many excess assets at all.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: