I'm genuinely confused why there is so much backlash against the Commons Clause. Ignoring for a second the confusion around RedisLabs and its relationship with Redis core, the Commons Clause is setting out to solve the following problem with open source:

  - A person or company creates an open-source library, at great cost of time and effort.
  - A big company adds that library to their cloud offerings, at arguably far lesser cost, and monetizes it.
  - The library author receives no compensation.

This article seems to argue against the Commons Clause because it's not 'true open source,' but this seems like a purely ideological argument that sidesteps the true problem that CC is trying to solve: open source creators not getting a cut of the profit they are generating for big companies. Am I missing something here?

Affero GPL is the license that purports to solve this problem. It's been around for a while, and it's getting some use, but I wouldn't call it popular.

Spectrum Labs | Frontend & Backend Software Engineers | Palo Alto, CA | ONSITE | Full-Time | https://www.getspectrum.io

We’re building tools that help online communities, brands, and content creators manage user generated content. Help us fight back against toxic comments, foster civil discussion, and improve audience engagement!

We’re looking for frontend and backend software engineers. Bonus points for machine learning experience. Here’s our stack:

Front-end:

  * React
  * Redux
  * ES6
  * Webpack

Back-end:

  * Java on Spring
  * Scala on Spark
  * Postgres for persistence
  * Redis for caching

We offer you your choice of laptop and monitor, competitive salary and equity, and health benefits. We’re a tiny team of 4 and are looking to expand!

Drop me a line at matthew [at] getspectrum.io if you’re interested.

I joined 2 months ago and am so happy I did. We're tackling difficult problems, but that makes it all the more enjoyable!

Thanks for the feedback! All good points. I definitely need to add some sharing capabilities in there. In the future I'll give users the option to switch between grid and list views, but for now I just want the site out there for people to use and give me feedback on.

Anti-repost functionality is another thing I'm working on and will add in a future release.

Oh, I meant just to share the site on fb or something... There's sharing for each one of the posts, but I also just mean in general for the site

Yeah, I agree. I removed the 'pick your sites' copy altogether - I didn't really need it anyway.

True. Perhaps 'services' or 'social networks' might be better words?

I think your headline doesn't work very well because it doesn't describe the actual process : you say

"Pick your favorite sites. Take a video. Swipe to share."

And what I would do is more like :

Pick a video I've made / Make a video > Slide to the site I want to send it to.

Or maybe I just haven't understood the process at all ^^

Thank you freshfey! Glad you like it!

I used the online Stanford CS139P class and some PeepCode screencasts to get started. I come from a web dev background so it was difficult for me at first to wrap my head around Objective-C, but after using those two resources I was able to understand the syntax (and the SDK) much more clearly.