Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | murkle's commentslogin

Google have just released a numerical solution to that one!

https://colab.research.google.com/github/google-deepmind/alp...


Yes, that does work basically. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45001593




Works well for flat parabolas. For "tall" ones you can get a big jump just after the peak https://www.geogebra.org/m/eft5vqbd


That's a fair critique, although I think you could mitigate that by decreasing the desired arclength - reducing Del S to 0.5 from 0.85 in your example mostly fixes the problem.

In the context of the game described in the post, the main variable we were concerned about was u_x, because we scaled difficulty by increasing it over time. This in fact results in flatter parabolas, so I actually had quite the opposite concern of what you outlined and might have over-optimized in that direction!

Thanks for taking the time to read and try out what's described in the post. It's my first time working on a technical blog, and I'm extremely grateful for any constructive feedback / criticism :)


You need 100% infill to ensure it's working for the right reason.

I've got one mostly working with quite a lot of sanding


Guessing this is impossible with an FDM printer.


Exactly, add them up and divide by 2. What's the answer?


TFA goes into this somehow but I fail to see why it's so hard to grasp that they are the same. Maybe I should read more crackpot blogs!


.STl files are available to download and print here:

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kmcrane/Projects/RestingBodies/suppl...


Where do you see that? I see "No significant associations were found for milk chocolate intake" and "Intake of milk, but not dark, chocolate was positively associated with weight gain."


Ah, I stand corrected: the study starts by stating "After adjusting for personal, lifestyle, and dietary risk factors, participants consuming ≥5 servings/week of any chocolate showed a significant 10% (95% CI 2% to 17%; P trend=0.07) lower rate of T2D compared with those who never or rarely consumed chocolate", but goes on to split by chocolate types and then the positive effect disappears for milk chocolate.


Sorry, this one is really terrible (also I asked for no audio) https://math-gpt.org/?video_id=6f622c5b-ccf3-408f-9db1-56d63...


Thank you for the feedback! Working on it!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: