Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ndr_'s commentslogin

Is there a trustworthy third-party "Retro" keyboard app - none of the shenanigans that made the default keyboard bad, and also no typing exfiltration to third-party servers?

I imagine the problem could be severe enough to some that they would pay the price of the Apple Developer program just so they may install such a Retro keyboard app from Github - if one exists?


Any insights into what "native video support" actually means? Is it just good at interpreting consecutive full frame images taken at intervals (thus missing out on fast events) or is there something more elaborate to it?


Some of the problems with GPT-5 in ChatGPT could actually be due to new model that is in place to route requests to the actual GPT-5 models. There are four models in the GPT-5 family, and I could reproduce the faulty "blueberry" test result only with the "gpt-5-chat" (aka "gpt-5-main") model through the API. This model is there to answer (near) instantly and it falls in the non-thinking category of LLMs. The "blueberry" test represents what they are particularly bad at (and what OpenAI set out to solve with o1). The other thinking models in the family, including gpt-5-nano, solve this correctly.


so can we please stop talking of AGI until counting letter in a word are not hard?


A confabulated arc to my current employer during a ChatGPT session led me to discover that ChatGPT Team injects four fields — full name, email, user name, and organization — into the prompt it sends to LLM. This happens even when the “Memory” feature and all personalization settings are disabled. The free tier doesn’t do this.

Can anyone on ChatGPT Enterprise or other LLM chat systems (Claude.ai, Google AI, etc.) reproduce this? Thoughts on practical privacy or compliance implications?


I had success through Amazon Bedrock on us-east1 during European office hours. Died 9 minutes before 10 a.m. New York time, though.


He confirms he could do an iOS port: https://mastodon.social/@andyq/114738867580032204


I've had several banking apps (and I believe one airline or hotel booking app as well) scan my ICAO passport as part of KYC, so this is definitely a thing.

Much preferred over the usual "send us a photo of your password as a means of authentication".


Pieces don‘t fit together right now: the documentation lists a parameter that isn‘t there in the Python package (moderation in Images.generate) or works differently (image in Images.Edit), the sample code doesn‘t even run (Images.Edit again) and the Prompts Playground does does unfathomable things (stich multiple input images together, according to the code returned?).

Or am I missing something?

Colab: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/17bCNsdjcMVFb5u_YMs7...


I tried to reproduce this study, but couldn‘t: https://ndurner.github.io/russian-propaganda. What‘s the missing piece?


"would likely accept", he says. Meaning: he didn't try?

If you look at the upper right corner, you'll notice that "Republique de pologne" is truncated. Same for the small prints: "OSSUE", srsly?

Originals look like this: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/prado/en/POL-AO-05002/image-...


I talk about this, kind-of, in my article about process visualization (in German, available behind paywall and in print). It‘s not rigorous in the sense that I give points, but a picture emerges along the way. Based on the full set of practical examples there, I would recommend the „v1“ of Claude 3.5 Sonnet. GPT 4.5 also looks good, but I haven‘t run the full suite.

https://www.heise.de/ratgeber/Prozessvisualisierung-mit-gene...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: