Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | notduncansmith's commentslogin

I hope you’re joking :)


Russian bot tactic? Guessing it’s an easy way to farm interaction as people comment back to correct the mistake.


An innocent coincidence, by two established users that link their contact info in their profile. It must be the Russians!

It's genuinely sad that this level of Cold War paranoia has been normalized again.


I didn’t read the author as blaming, and I can relate to what they’re saying. It’s hard to speak about a childhood full of abuses that thought they had your best interests at heart. I was locked in my room for days on end (sometimes back-to-back stints for weeks), deprived of privileges/books/music, berated, demeaned, and ultimately gaslit, throughout my childhood, because my parents didn’t really understand ADHD (or that I had it). It created a pretty big mismatch between expectations and reality. As a kid, I resented them a lot for this. As an adult (and parent), I realize what it must have looked like to them and I can empathize without condoning their behavior.

My performance is heavily bimodal: my adult ADHD assessment included scores in the 98th percentile and the 8th depending on the task. I also have an extremely wandering mind. Taken together, it seemed to my parents that I was a brilliant child who simply “refused to work hard”. This was not only toxic for my relationship with them, it poisoned my self-image and ability to relate to others for the first two decades of my life.

Any resentment I might have over that is ultimately misplaced. They were loving and caring parents who missed the mark in a way that just so happened to fundamentally shape my childhood experience. ADHD wasn’t even understood the way it is now, so the most I could have hoped for in childhood was a prescription.

Instead, I now make a point to be a parent who understands my own ADHD and my kid’s (which thankfully is pretty identical to mine). I help them use alarm clocks and timers like I do. I give them tools to understand and empathize with other people. I don’t treat dragging their feet on a task as disrespect or disinterest. I don’t get hurt when they lash out at me during a hard time. I’m not baffled or disgusted when their words reveal their underdeveloped empathy, and I try to accelerate that development.

I just cannot agree more that it’s a difficult job to get right. All kids need structure and discipline, but the types and amounts can vary widely, even for the same kid across their stages of development. I’m so thankful for the research that has been done and resources that have been created since I was young; without that I would have been a lot more like my parents, and my kid would have barely had a chance. I also appreciate OP for sharing their experience with us. It’s not fun to do but it’s necessary for understanding to grow.


Given the coordination/cooperation aspect of the problem, this isn’t really the “wisdom of the crowd” as I’ve always understood it.

Something like estimating the number of beans in a jar is a good fit, since there is only one layer of perception to agree on and no coordination required.

This experiment as described seems closer to “design by committee” with (predictably) similar results.


Happy birthday :)


This is wrong. You can absolutely dose psylocybin at levels that make a meaningful difference in experience (certainly enough to have an anti-depressant effect) without “tripping” or being in any way impaired. For many adults, this will be around 100-200mg of psilocybin.


It's not a question of impairment, it's a question of whether you come to some determination of whether you are in the control group or not.


Microgram, not milligram, of psilocybin. 100mg of psilocybin would be about 50-200 grams of dried cubensis mushroom.

There have been studies on microdosing, but it’s also valuable to know what happens at perceptible doses as well. It’s certainly a different experience.


+1 have had to edit Prisma files after generating a migration, it went fine. As ‘moltar says, no magic.


This was my first thought. The entire text label should toggle the radio or checkbox, not just the box and the padding.


This certainly seems within the realm of possibility but can you link to a source?



Thanks for the references


That’s fine, but then we need to stop privatizing the AI. If a coalition of companies (and maybe government?) were to train open model weights, and run those models on equal-access hardware (i.e. all residents of the country get N compute credits per year) then we’d be much closer to a system where “intellectual works should automatically benefit society” — however, that is not what we are seeing today.


Why? I don’t need to equally and freely share the expertise I develop by consuming publicly available information. In fact, I personally profit from it. Should I compensate every YouTube creator, author, journalist, for the money I’ve made in my career that their publicly available work contributed to in terms of my learning/education?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: