Whistleblowed dog food.

normally you don't share your dog food when you find out it actually sucks.

That’s not part of the open source definition.

You can claim the open source code isn’t Windows 11, but you can’t complain the code isn’t open source.

  > you can’t complain the code isn’t open source

(unless, of course, the code isn't licensed under an OSI-approved license. Parent didn't actually specify which license the hypothetical not-windows-11 was being "open sourced" under, so we can't actually say for sure whether this hypothetical release is open source or not)

</pedantry>

Yes that’s correct. I’m imagining it’s the Apache license like the X code, which is indeed an open source license.

> I feel like we need more awareness on what is open-source and how does it work. This is NOT open source.

People are saying withhold ozempic, and sure maybe. But what about the 38 TRILLION in US debt. I'm sure the Europeans could dump that on whatever sucker wants to hold it - forcing rates into the stratosphere.

According to a Deutsche Bank report Europe holds about $8 trillion of that debt

Grok says Elon is fitter than LeBron James. It's billed as an intelligence but that belies the hidden editorial layer, secretly directing it's output.

Anyone trusting this is deeply misguided.

Now how does that work? Surely it would make any sperm more likely to win.

> When these males mate with females, the resulting eggs are infertile and so small that they don’t affect crops.

How so? photons that don't participate in the reaction?

There’s that, but I meant just turning electrical energy into photons. Diode lasers are pretty decent at 50ish percent efficient. Everything else is way, way worse.