Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nym's commentslogin

Yes.


Steven K. Roberts is amazing. He was very influential on my ideas around technology when I was about 12. Super awesome guy. Never afraid of living on the bleeding edge


Setup a monthly $5 donation. It's not much, but I know how valuable the archive is... they're doing the work the library of congress SHOULD be doing.


> I know how valuable the archive is

How valuable is it?


$5/mo ;)


Data is generally hard to put a value on.


When I took an animal communication class in college, there was a formula for the value of information (not data).

I don't remember the exact formula, but it was similar Shannon's equation. Basically, the more valuable information is, the larger the change it affects in the probably of what an organisms next behavioral state is. So, if information signaling didn't change the behavior of another organism, it wasn't considered communication.


The implication through a lot of this discussion is that it's greater than zero and even that I question.


Would love to rent one then!


As someone who ran a startup and worked for several others in the valley, then moved away: I agree.


> The phone companies say that the ruling will free up more of their resources to improve their broadband services, although at least one FCC commissioner says he will be watching to see if that's really the case.

> ISPs such as EarthLink, which already have a hard time competing on price, may still negotiate access contracts with the phone companies but are looking for alternative ways to deliver their services.

EarthLink sold the next year to Windstream for $673 million in an all-stock transaction. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/11/dial-...

Three years later... Windstream unloads legacy EarthLink internet assets for $330M https://www.fiercetelecom.com/telecom/windstream-unloads-leg...


And Speakeasy to Covad.


Maybe it's that facebook encourages the content from your friends that is toxic, because that toxic content leads to more clicks, engagement, and ultimately revenue.


Laws like this are selective in nature.


Is Facebook notifying the affected people that they had viewed fabricated news, or just releasing press releases?


Does any of this content qualify as "fabricated news" ? Can you point out what you mean by that?


Facebook: Hey everyone! No more cryptocurrency ads.

Google: We're banning them too.

Big Pharma: But not us right?

Google: No, we appreciate your business...

Facebook: How much are you looking to spend??


Dumb comparison. At least medicine heals people.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: