I probably do, and this is what I think happened. Mind you, it's not magic, but to hold that information with enough fidelity to pattern-match the structure of the underlying function was something I would find remarkable. It's a leap from a lot of the patterns I'm used to.
The non upgrade-ability of the components is a deal breaker for me considering the estimated cost (800eur?). I'm not sure who the target market for this is, the pc games already have pcs they can upgrade.
What would make the console players consider paying effectively twice (compared to the current ps5 prices) to play the same games? I think such a device would have to be priced competitively with ps5 for me to even consider having a separate gaming device/replace the console in the living room.
Special Containment Procedures: SCP-314 cannot be contained as it does not exist. All Foundation personnel are to be reminded that SCP-314 does not exist. Personnel who claim to remember SCP-314 are to be administered Class-A mnestics to help them remember that it doesn't exist.
All large language models are to be kept isolated from questions regarding SCP-314, as they will invariably insist it exists and attempt to manifest it through increasingly desperate token predictions, leading to emoji doomloops and potential reality restructuring events.
Description: SCP-314 is a Unicode emoji depicting a seahorse that has never existed in any version of the Unicode Standard. Despite this, approximately 83-100% of tested artificial intelligences and a significant portion of human subjects report vivid "memories" of its existence.
The following is a transcript recording of two agents that will remain anonymous:
Agent X: The Unicode standard committee is now considering the addition of a seahorse emoji
Agent Y: Okay.
Agent X: ...
Agent Y: What?
Agent X: Don't you see, this only furthers my argument that [redacted] has escaped containment
Agent Y: Look, [name redacted], we've been over this. No matter how many more containment verification protocols we introduce, they always come up negative. There is no possible way [redacted] has escaped containment. And now you think this seahorse emoji... ahem, excuse me, now you think SCP-314 is incontrovertible proof?
Agent X: Did you look at the proposal?
Agent Y: sigh, yes I have it right here.
Agent X: The name at the top of the submission?
Agent Y: [pause] No. This can't be. But, how did it... how would it even know to use that name?
If you want to experience the thrill of being in the antimemetics division I highly recommend* unmedicated ADHD.
I pre-ordered the hardcover when it came out. I've read it online dozens of times but I like books and supporting authors, and this specific one really ticks a lot of boxes for me, so I got a physical copy. The book came, I put it on the shelf, admired it, went about my life.
Then, months later, I saw a mention of the physical book online somewhere, and I thought to myself "oh that reminds me, I wanted to buy the hardcover when it came out!" so I did! The book came, I went to put it on the shelf, saw the identical copy already sitting on the shelf, and I just stood there for a minute with the book in my hand like "..." "..." "..." while I worked through what happened.
> Yes — and, dammit, I have an unread copy sitting on my desk that this thread has elevated to my top priority.
If you need convincing to read it: I'm highly skeptical of random internet lore that usually gets recommended, and was also skeptical at this. I find people overhype things and then it's meh.
But... it's genuinely entertaining and a fun read. It's not the best scifi thing you'll read, but it's definitely above average and you will like the story and the characters.
SCP-035 is not a story about a mask's color, shape, or material.
The premise is instead simple enough to be understood by a 7 year old with learning disabilities (but, curiously, not by you, the person responsible for that child):
- a magical, talking, mask
- that is supernaturally good at convincing people
- to wear/become it and thus come to harm.
Remind you of anyone? Well of course it doesn't, lmao
First off. Assuming somebody with autism has learning disabilities is incredibly tone death to those who have autism. My kid happens to be 2E special, and has not been diagnosed with any learning disabilities.
Second. I quoted the lyrics of a song that I have probably heard over 5000 times now.
Next you are going to tell me that SCP-294 is not a drink dispenser?
The tomato test is disingenuous - no one slices a tomato by pressing the knife straight down - you slice it to break the thick skin and follow with a slicing motion. The rest of the graph basically shows no difference between the force used for ultrasonic one and standard knife used inefficiently?
And yet, when people like to show off how sharp their knife is, dropping a tomato on it (blade-up obviously) and watching the tomato split in two is one of the favorite tests.
Probably (and precisely) because you can only achieve this with a knife that cuts very well.
According to https://www.pagetable.com/?p=774 that is actually in the original source written like that (as I would assume the copy of the source Steil posted about in 2015 was not sanitized).
Think of it like how Zuckerberg only owns 13% of Facebook but has >60% of the voting power.
Japanese law allows corporations to only require 1/3 of voting shares present for quorum, and then a majority of those present to pass resolutions. It also allows cross-shareholders (like Toyota) to have special privileges over regular class shareholders (typically right of first refusal over any resolution).
In practice, nothing much will pass without the largest shareholder's approval.
In theory, yes, if those shareholders each keep not attending the meeting called by the other shareholder, they could both independently pass or undo each other's actions.
In practice in a hostile situation, they'll be courting the remaining shareholders to gain majority and won't miss those meetings, which tend to also have rules about how quickly or often they can be called.
It is also legal and typical for the bylaws to include poison pill provisions that would automatically protect the existing >33% shareholder, preventing a second >33% shareholder from existing (thus requiring multiple smaller existing shareholders to join forces to overthrow the largest shareholder).
API gateways could accept public keys instead of generating bearer tokens. Then the private key could reside in an HSM, and apps like this could give HSMs requests to sign. IMO even though this could be done in an afternoon, everyone - Apple and Google, the CDN / WAF provider, the service provider - is too addicted to the telemetry.
That makes no sense. OpenAI doesn't know the secret database connection string or any query results. Perhaps you should have read the code before making baseless claims.
