No it has not been 0.5 for years. Check their homepage. You can see the timeline for the releases there. 0.5 was released a few days ago and is a major step for the language.
Pretty much every country involved in WW II "killed countless civilians". Some of them killed their own civilians as well. But yeah, the US were the ones who did it most efficiently at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
When you had therapy for several years there are very wise therapists and authors that teach you that the opposite iOS true despite sounding paradox: Freedom is the limitation of choices.
Elon can give them 400B and he would still have a net worth of 100B and from that he can again get back to his former net worth in a few years. The world is not fair.
> Selling 100B worth of stocks for anything close to 100B is not possible. That volume would mini-crash the entire exchange
Nasdaq trades about half a trillion dollars a day [1]. Even if Musk were an idiot and dumped $100bn in one day, it would crash Tesla's stock price, not the Nasdaq.
If Musk wanted to give OpenAI $100bn, the best way to do it would be to (a) borrow against his shares or (b) given OpenAI his (non-voting) shares.
> Yes, I think this is an insult to our profession.
I don't think the Mint's goal is to celebrate developers and computer scientists with the new coins. They're celebrating famous innovators and innovations from each state.
Of course. The author had to be bullshitting. It tried it many times already and it is impossible to let any frontier model program in Zig. The language is evolving too fast and can have breaking changes everyday and the knowledge cutoff for most AI models is only somewhere around the end of last year. Btw, the knowledge cutoff always being so far out-of-date is one of the things I absolutely hate using AI for.
Is that versioning site supposed to be some kind of joke? I can't really figure out if they are joking or serious - the tone comes off as joking, but it could be read as serious too.
reply