Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more owlstuffing's commentslogin

Or, if you are an AI:

“I prefer the em dash — it’s my calling card.”


Nice!

I’m currently using manifold-sql with duckdb for this.


Thanks! That’s a great combo — manifold-sql + duckdb gives you strong typing with powerful SQL under the hood. Fahmatrix is aiming to complement that approach for cases where you want quick, native Java code without SQL — e.g., when building data flows or custom logic inline. Would love to hear if you’ve hit any pain points that a Java-native approach could help with.


Languages should strive to type safely inline SQL and other structured data.

With Java the manifold project achieves this via compiler plugin. The manifold-sql[1] module provides inline, type safe, native SQL.

1.https://github.com/manifold-systems/manifold/blob/master/man...


If your language has macros you can get by as well https://github.com/elixir-dbvisor/sql


If this interests you, I highly recommend Luca Boasso’s oberonc project for the JVM[1].

1. https://github.com/lboasso/oberonc


Author of oberonc here, thanks for trying it out :)


Right. Oracle should reconsider the naming here: stable -> lazy


Downhill fast since JB hastily exited its offices in St. Petersburg and Novosibirsk. It’s no coincidence.


Cool tool, even cooler when paired with the manifold project for SQL[1], which has fantastic support for type-safe, native DuckDB syntax.

1. https://github.com/manifold-systems/manifold/blob/master/man...


Agree 1000%

There’s a Java compiler plugin[1] that muscles in operator overloading pretty comprehensively, and works with all LTS JDKs.

1. https://github.com/manifold-systems/manifold/tree/master/man...


> We never stopped manufacturing, we just stopped employing people.

That’s a misleading oversimplification. While it’s true we haven’t stopped manufacturing, we did offshore a massive portion of it--especially after the Open Door Policy with China and subsequent free trade agreements. That shift didn’t just change where things are made; it fundamentally altered corporate incentives. Once production moved overseas, the need to invest in domestic labor--training, benefits, long-term employment--shrank accordingly.


Yes, I should have said "we just stopped employing americans".


I suppose so, since your use of “we” includes both America and China et al.


Outside of government, this shift also coincides with the decline of pensions and the rise of the 401k.

Career growth has always been a shared responsibility between employees and employers. In white-collar fields--especially medicine and engineering--education has long been frontloaded, with formal schooling as the main on-ramp.

Blue-collar jobs, by contrast, have relied more on trade schools, mentorship, and hands-on training. These pathways have steadily eroded since the 1980s.

Much of this traces back to the Open Door Policy with China and the broader Free Trade Agreements that followed. These moved massive segments of industry offshore--along with the structures that once incentivized long-term employee development through education and skill-building.

Revitalizing domestic industry could reintroduce competition among employers, which in turn could restore the pre-1990s incentives for long-term investment in the workforce.


I would point to the emergence of Milton Friedman’s school of thought that the only thing a company should care for is delivering “shareholder value.”


It's the same problem in the trades. Apprentices tend to cost the company more than their output so no one wants to hire and train them.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: