I think it still works if you set your user agent to something like lynx. I had a custom UA set for Google search in Firefox just for this purpose and to disable AI overviews.
I just tried with the "links" browser and I get a "Update your browser. Your browser isn't supported anymore. To continue your search, upgrade to a recent version"
Concerns were raised regarding the authorship of this paper, validity of the research findings in the context of misrepresentation of the contributions by the authors and the study sponsor and potential conflicts of interest of the authors.
It is also hard for me to understand this angle. While in Russia at the moment and China the "they" is pretty much constant, it is not the case in EU. Why would be in their interest something that can be used against them the moment the tide turns?
> Why would be in their interest something that can be used against them the moment the tide turns?
They are doing this to prevent tide turn and personally, I feel like if both/many political parties agree to something like chat-control and agree that they make it a bi-partisan issue, then they can fundamentally do it and the "they" would be constant
Also the "they" here also refers to lobbying efforts. The billionaires/millionaires/rich people might like these things solely because it increases the influence of govt. and thus the rich people as well
As an example, Let me present to you the UK censorship act which tries to threaten any and every website with a very large price which is very scary to many people who have thus shut down their services / websites to UK at large if they were a niche project/couldn't do it
Internet as we speak, would continue on to become more centralized. I feel like the idea here is that make internet so centralized that you can control the flow of information itself(I mean it already is but there are still some spots left like hackernews as an example)
Its also one step towards authoritarianism. This could be a stepping stone for something even larger which could have a more constant "they" as well but I have already provided some reasonings as to why they do that, simply because they can and chat control gives them a way to do mass surveillance which is something which to me increases the infleunece of both parties or the whole system massively in a way which feels very threatening to freedom/democracy making it thus dystopian.
I love this, and so many good projects mentioned in the comments too. My son just turned three and we still have a real CD player that we use, sometimes, but now often it's streaming from Spotify or NAS. I was just thinking about how to do something similar, thanks for the inspiration ♥
This is so cool. I'm using BirdNET on Android for a long time and that is awesome, but running continuous monitoring on a Pi is really interesting. I saw there was also a Home Assistant integration for it.
yes! Home Assistant integration with BirdNET will take the audio streams from your cameras; no immediate need for the BirdNET-Pi. Since cameras are often outside, there is better chance to capture some interesting bird audio.
I rarely buy from Amazon, but some small things I find only there. I ordered some phone accessories last week and needed a little more for free delivery so I added a shampoo. They dropped the shampoo without packaging in a paper bag with all the other stuff, when I opened it, of course, the shampoo was all over everything.
Their packaging and delivery quality is one of the worst. But they are still responsive to customer requests, although that is going down the sewer as well. I get often responses that look LLM/chatbot generated and often not answering my question. Or they try something like, sure I'll get you the refund as soon as you place the order again. Then I insist they refund now and so far I always got my money back.
So, basically their advantage for me is their sortiment (but you need to navigate through a lot of fake and garbage products), free returns and quick refund (often even without a return). But this is not a very strong one and I very rarely open their website - the pile of low quality listing is so off-putting that I generally avoid.
Sorry, I'm not an Apple user, so I'm not 100% sure if this is about forcing Apple to avoid/break E2E encryption (E2E in the true sense like Proton Mail) in the UK or to give them the keys they already can obtain themselves?
Maybe the package that requires lazy can somehow declare that requirement, so another package that tries to force not lazy will fail early and realize it needs to replace this dependency with something compatible or change its ways. It definitely adds complexity, though.
Or check at runtime if it's running with the lazy import feature active. Then instead of breaking in mysterious ways in production it would crash on startup, during development.
